What is a moral foreign policy?
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Wednesday
June 29, 2022

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 29, 2022
What is a moral foreign policy?

Thoughts

Joseph S. Nye, Jr.
06 March, 2020, 01:50 pm
Last modified: 06 March, 2020, 01:53 pm

Related News

  • Ending North Korea’s isolation is the only solution left
  • Bangladesh ready to engage with everyone who wishes no harm: Momen
  • New Philippine President Marcos is no Duterte on foreign policy
  • Bangladesh should prioritise its own interest
  • In modern war, short-sellers aren’t on the sidelines

What is a moral foreign policy?

A foreign policy should be judged not only by specific actions, but also by how a pattern of actions shapes the environment of world politics. Leadership in supplying global public goods, for example, is consistent with “America First,” but it rests on a broader historical and institutional understanding than Donald Trump has shown.

Joseph S. Nye, Jr.
06 March, 2020, 01:50 pm
Last modified: 06 March, 2020, 01:53 pm
United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Photo: Project Syndicate
United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Photo: Project Syndicate

Many Americans say they want a moral foreign policy, but disagree on what that means. Using a three-dimensional scorecard encourages us to avoid simplistic answers and to look at the motives, means, and consequences of a US president's actions.

Consider, for example, the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and the two George Bushes. When people call for a "Reaganite foreign policy," they mean to highlight the clarity of his rhetoric in the presentation of values. Clearly stated objectives helped educate and motivate the public at home and abroad.

But that was only one aspect of Reagan's foreign policy. The success of his moral leadership also relied on his means of bargaining and compromise. The key question is whether he was prudent in balancing his objectives and the risks of trying to achieve them. 

Reagan's initial rhetoric in his first term created a dangerous degree of tension and distrust between the United States and the Soviet Union, increasing the risk of a miscalculation or accident leading to war. But it also created incentives to bargain, which Reagan later put to good use when Mikhail Gorbachev came to power in the Soviet Union. Reagan advanced US national interests, and he did so in a manner that did not exclusively benefit American interests.

In contrast, George H.W. Bush, by his own admission, did not promote a transformative foreign-policy vision at the end of the Cold War. His goal was to avoid disaster during a period of rapid and far-reaching geopolitical change. While he referred to a "new world order," he never spelled out what it would look like. As Bush and his team responded to forces that were largely outside of his control, he set goals that balanced opportunities and prudence.

Bush limited his short-term aims in order to pursue long-term stability, prompting some critics to complain that he did not set more ambitious objectives. Instead, he was prudent in a turbulent time, and managed to achieve American goals in a manner that was not unduly insular and did minimal damage to the interests of foreigners. He was careful not to humiliate Gorbachev and to manage Boris Yeltsin's transition to leadership in Russia.

With better communication skills, Bush might also have been able to do more to educate the American public about the changing nature of the world they faced after the Cold War. But given the uncertainties of history, and the potential for disaster as the Cold War ended, Bush had one of the best foreign policies of the period after 1945. He allowed the US to benefit from the Cold War's outcome while avoiding calamity.

His son, George W. Bush, started his first term in office with limited interest in foreign policy, but his objectives became transformational after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. He became focused on national security but turned to the rhetoric of democracy to rally his followers in a time of crisis. His 2002 national security strategy, which came to be called the "Bush Doctrine," proclaimed that the US would "identify and eliminate terrorists wherever they are, together with the regimes that sustain them."

In this new game, there were few rules and inadequate attention to the means. Bush's solution to the terrorist threat was to spread democracy, and a "freedom agenda" thus became the basis of his 2006 national security strategy. But he lacked the means to democratize Iraq. The removal of Saddam Hussein did not accomplish the mission, and inadequate understanding of the context, together with poor planning and management, undercut Bush's grand objectives. The result was a sectarian civil war in Iraq and a strengthening of the terrorist groups that eventually became the Islamic State (ISIS).

A perpetual problem in US foreign policy is the complexity of the context, which increases the likelihood of unintended consequences. Prudence is sometimes dismissed as mere self-interest, but in foreign policy, it becomes a virtue. Negligent assessment and reckless risk-taking often lead to immoral consequences, or what in legal terms is called "culpable negligence." Prudence also requires the ability to manage one's emotions. In both respects, President Donald Trump's rejection of intelligence and reliance on television sources raises serious moral as well as practical questions about his foreign policy.

That leads, in turn, to the question of the role of institutions and how broadly a president defines America's national interest. A president's foreign policy depends not just on specific actions, but also on how a pattern of actions shapes the environment of world politics. Leadership by the world's most powerful country in the supply of global public goods is consistent with "America First," but it rests on a broader understanding of that term than Trump has shown. As Henry Kissinger has put it, "calculations of power without a moral dimension will turn every disagreement into a test of strength … Moral prescriptions without concern for equilibrium, on the other hand, tend toward either crusades or an impotent policy tempting challenges; either extreme risks endangering the coherence of the international order itself."

Prudence is a necessary virtue for a good foreign policy, but it is not sufficient. American presidents have been prudent when they needed to embrace a broader institutional vision. In the future, a sense of vision and strategy that correctly understands and responds to new technological and environmental changes – such as cyber threats, artificial intelligence, climate change, and pandemics – will be crucial.

A moral foreign policy not only makes Americans safer, but also makes the world a better place. We judge moral policy by looking at behavior and institutions, acts of commission and omissions, and at all three dimensions of motives, means, and consequences. Even then, the nature of foreign policy – with its many contingencies and unforeseen events – means that we will often wind up with mixed verdicts. 

Joseph S. Nye, Jr., a professor at Harvard, is the author of Do Morals Matter? Presidents and Foreign Policy from FDR to Trump.

Foreign Policy / Secretary of State Mike Pompeo

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Bangladesh expects $5.5b from WB, IMF in budget support
    Bangladesh expects $5.5b from WB, IMF in budget support
  • Advance tax hits construction sector hard: Entrepreneurs
    Advance tax hits construction sector hard: Entrepreneurs
  • Representational Image: Collected
    ABB concerned over mandatory tax return submission for SME loans

MOST VIEWED

  • Ashikur Rahman Tuhin. Sketch: TBS
    Bangladesh’s apparel industry growth is here to stay
  • David E Adler. Sketch: TBS
    Who managed Covid-19 best, and why?
  • Volodymyr Yermolenko. Sketch: TBS
    From Pushkin to Putin: Russian literature’s imperial ideology
  • Farida Akhter. Sketch: TBS
    Bt Cotton approval. Another alarming threat?
  • Sketch: TBS
    The UN knows Afghanistan is messed up. But it’s keeping mum
  • Sketch: TBS
    A legal and political analysis of World Bank’s Padma Bridge snub

Related News

  • Ending North Korea’s isolation is the only solution left
  • Bangladesh ready to engage with everyone who wishes no harm: Momen
  • New Philippine President Marcos is no Duterte on foreign policy
  • Bangladesh should prioritise its own interest
  • In modern war, short-sellers aren’t on the sidelines

Features

Abortion is a part of healthcare. Photo: Bloomberg

Abortion is healthcare and women’s rights are human rights

12h | Panorama
Prashanta Kumar Banerjee. Sketch: TBS

'Public Asset Management Company can be an additional tool to curb bad loans'

14h | Interviews
Aid boats navigate through the different waters of Jamalganj Upazila, giving aid to flood victims.  Photo: Masum Billah

Bandits, hunger and snakes: Flood victims pass sleepless nights

16h | Panorama
Redmi 10C- Best Budget smartphone with one (big) compromise

Redmi 10C- Best Budget smartphone with one (big) compromise

1d | Brands

More Videos from TBS

Why teachers are being humiliated again and again?

Why teachers are being humiliated again and again?

4h | Videos
After Bangabandhu Bridge, will Padma Bridge change economy again?

After Bangabandhu Bridge, will Padma Bridge change economy again?

4h | Videos
 Fuel for non-essential vehicles banned in Sri Lanka

Fuel for non-essential vehicles banned in Sri Lanka

6h | Videos
Christiano Ronaldo to join Chelsea?

Christiano Ronaldo to join Chelsea?

7h | Videos

Most Read

1
Padma Bridge from satellite. Photo: Screengrab
Bangladesh

Padma Bridge from satellite 

2
Photo: TBS
Bangladesh

Motorcycles banned on Padma Bridge 

3
Japan cancels financing Matarbari coal project phase 2
Bangladesh

Japan cancels financing Matarbari coal project phase 2

4
Photo: Courtesy
Corporates

Gree AC being used in all parts of Padma Bridge project

5
Photo: TBS
Infrastructure

Gains from Padma Bridge to cross $10b, hope experts

6
Desco wanted to make a bold statement with their new head office building, a physical entity that would be a corporate icon. Photo: Courtesy
Habitat

Desco head office: When commitment to community and environment inspires architecture

EMAIL US
contact@tbsnews.net
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2022
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab
BENEATH THE SURFACE
Workers unload boats and stockpile sacks of paddy at the BOC Ghat paddy market on the bank of the River Meghna in Brahmanbaria’s Ashuganj, the largest paddy market in the eastern part of the country. This century-old market sells paddies worth Tk5-6 crore a day during the peak season. PHOTO: RAJIB DHAR

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net