Some US lawmakers have been promted to remove US President Donald Trump from office before his term officially ends after his supporters stormed the US Capitol on Wednesday.
After Trump addressed thousands of protesters in Washington, using his speech to repeat lies that the election was stolen from him, the chaotic scenes unfolded, reports the Guardian.
The events have renewed questions as to whether Trump could be declared unfit for for office, or charged with a criminal act. There are two ways to remove a president from office: the 25th amendment of the US constitution, and impeachment followed by a Senate conviction. In either scenario, the vice-president, Mike Pence, would take over until Biden's inauguration.
Calls for such a move are already under way from multiple Democrats who urged the invocation of the 25th amendment, while Ilhan Omar, a Minnesota Democratic congresswoman, said she was drawing up articles of impeachment.
Meanwhile, editorials from the New York Times and the Washington Post called for consequences in the form of Trump's removal.
The 25th amendment, ratified in 1967 and adopted in the wake of John F Kennedy's assassination in 1963, deals with presidential succession and disability.
Section 4 addresses situations in which a president is unable to do the job but does not step down voluntarily.
The drafters of the 25th amendment clearly intended for it to apply when a president is incapacitated by a physical or mental illness, experts say. Some scholars have also argued that it could also apply more broadly to a president who is dangerously unfit for office.
For the 25th amendment to be invoked, Pence and the majority of Trump's cabinet would need to declare that Trump is unable to perform the duties of the presidency and remove him. In that scenario, Pence would take over.
Trump could subsequently declare that he is capable of resuming the job. If Pence and the majority of the Cabinet do not contest Trump's determination, Trump regains power. If they dispute Trump's declaration, the issue would be decided by Congress, but Pence would continue to act as president until then.
A two-thirds majority of both chambers of Congress would be needed to keep Trump sidelined. But the Democratic-controlled House could simply delay voting on the substantive dispute until Trump's term ends, said Paul Campos, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Colorado.
Campos said the 25th amendment would be an appropriate way to remove Trump from office and has the benefit of being quicker than impeachment. "Pence could instantly become president, whereas impeachment and conviction could take at least a few days," Campos said.
A misconception about "impeachment" is that it refers to the removal of a president from office. In fact, impeachment refers only to the House of Representatives, the lower chamber of Congress, bringing charges that a president engaged in a "high crime or misdemeanors" – similar to an indictment in a criminal case.
Trump has already been impeached once and could be impeached a second time, for a different crime.
If a simple majority of the House's 435 members approves bringing charges, known as "articles of impeachment", the process moves to the Senate, the upper chamber, which holds a trial to determine the president's guilt. The constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict and remove a president.
Trump was previously impeached by the Democratic-led US House in December 2019 on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress stemming from his efforts to pressure Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son. Trump was acquitted by the Republican-led Senate in February 2020.
Frank Bowman, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Missouri, said Trump "arguably fomented sedition", or an attempted overthrowing of the US government.
But Bowman said Trump could also be impeached for a more general offense: disloyalty to the US constitution and failing to uphold his oath of office. Congress has discretion in defining a high crime and misdemeanor and is not limited to actual criminal offences.
"The essential offense would be one against the constitution – one of essentially trying to undermine the lawful results of a lawfully conducted election," Bowman said.