How liberal values became a business in Afghanistan
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Monday
June 27, 2022

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
MONDAY, JUNE 27, 2022
How liberal values became a business in Afghanistan

Thoughts

Ezzatullah Mehrdad, Foreign Policy
08 April, 2021, 11:20 am
Last modified: 08 April, 2021, 11:28 am

Related News

  • Ending North Korea’s isolation is the only solution left
  • Bangladesh ready to engage with everyone who wishes no harm: Momen
  • New Philippine President Marcos is no Duterte on foreign policy
  • Bangladesh should prioritise its own interest
  • In modern war, short-sellers aren’t on the sidelines

How liberal values became a business in Afghanistan

Washington promised to bring liberal democracy to Kabul. It created a bloated and ineffective sector of artificial NGOs instead.

Ezzatullah Mehrdad, Foreign Policy
08 April, 2021, 11:20 am
Last modified: 08 April, 2021, 11:28 am
Ezzatullah Mehrdad. Illustration: TBS
Ezzatullah Mehrdad. Illustration: TBS

Over the last two decades, the United States injected millions of dollars and deployed over 700,000 troops aimed at counterinsurgency and planting the seeds of liberal values and democracy in Afghanistan. But liberal values did not blossom in the society, nor did democratic processes take root in U.S.-funded institutions, including the Afghan government.

This legacy has put the Biden administration in an awkward position: It must decide whether to support the liberal values in the proposed political settlement or ignore them and get out. Because Afghanistan lacks both an organic civil society and institutions that could shape the political settlement in favor of a democratic dispensation, the United States—if it chooses not to cut and run—now has the chance to push for a democratic sphere that would actually allow Afghans to shape their political fate.

In his memoir, The Envoy, Zalmay Khalilzad, who remains the torchbearer of U.S. policymakers focused on Afghanistan, wrote that he told then-U.S. President George W. Bush in 2002: "We can't fix our problems without helping them fix their problems." In the following years, the U.S. government injected millions of dollars trying to fix Afghanistan in the name of "state-building"—setting up new social and political structures in the country.

After the United States established a pop-up government and constitution in Kabul, engineering civil society from the scratch came next. While a thriving civil society in most democratic countries is seen as unpaid social and political activism and hailed as the backbone of democracy, the U.S. government paid Afghans to set up nongovernmental organizations. The NGOs held workshops and seminars, teaching Afghans about liberal values.

Instead of using local resources and civil society, the artificial civil society created by U.S. money flourished as long as the funds poured into the country. "Local councils were altogether sidelined," said Omar Sadr, a political science professor at the American University of Afghanistan. "The new civil society was not organic. They were accountable only to the donors, rather than to Afghanistan."

The first group of NGOs moved from Peshawar, Pakistan, to Kabul in the early 2000s. The organizations had previously worked for Afghan refugees in Peshawar and were able to secure funds to implement projects that intended to promote values such as women rights and human rights. The U.S. government spent $787 million to support women's rights with little result, according to a congressional watchdog which found high maternal mortality rates, widespread gender-based violence, and limited access to healthcare and education for women.

Working for liberal values turned into a business. Any group of educated people could launch an NGO, draft proposals for U.S. and other foreign funds, and implement a six-month project. Real estate companies and landlords thrived on the rents that organizations paid in Kabul. The NGOs paid fees for participants, rather than the other way around. Attending workshops about human rights, in essence, became a job.

"The values did not reach the bottom of the society," said Mir Hamza Murshid, a participant in many of these workshops. "I never forgive those who misused the resources."

The business inflicted huge damage to Afghan society. Many of the NGOs went to villages and corrupted the century-old traditions of community service. One practice is known as "assembling": people gather and work to resolve an issue facing their community. The NGOs paid people for assembling on a project for which they had secured funding. After that, people began hesitating to do community service—asking: Why should we work for free when we can be paid?

It had an impact on student activism, too. As the artificial NGO business flourished over the last two decades, young Afghans came of age learning that activism could be profitable as long as you steer clear of controversial causes. In 2013, 300,000 Afghans graduated from high schools, and in 2017, 50,000 Afghans graduated from universities. The tally has been increasing each year. In the absence of funding for antiwar organizations, there has not been even one student-led nationwide protest against the war, despite the fact that Afghanistan has been plagued by war for 40 years and loses an estimated 20 young men in battle every day since 2001.

Between 2001 and 2014, the U.S.-funded government of President Hamid Karzai signed up for multiple liberal international laws and copy-pasted liberal laws from Western countries, without institutionalizing the democratic values and processes that would support an organic civil society and democracy in the country. In 2019, 1.8 million people out of approximately 9 million registered voters cast ballots the presidential elections; 300,000 votes were contested, and both President Ashraf Ghani and his challenger, Abdullah Abdullah, declared victory and held competing swearing-in ceremonies in March 2020.

In recent years, the Afghan government has approved amendments to reverse the copy-pasted legal foundations of the open and free social and political sphere in the country. The efforts by the U.S.-funded government have aimed to expand its control and limit influence of NGOs, crushing the civil society and damaging the civic voice of Afghans. The intelligence unit of the Economist ranked Afghanistan as an authoritarian regime in 2021.

 "From one side, the government was facing a military conflict. On the other side, rather than seeing the civil society as a partner, the government saw the civil society as a foe," Sadr, the political science professor, said.

In 2017, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani approved amendments to the law on demonstrations and strikes. The law sets conditions that essentially make it impossible for people to hold protests. It prohibits demonstrations that create traffic jams, it allows the government to arrest the demonstrators on charges of working for anti-national interests, and, in an unusual move, it allows the police to refuse permission for demonstrators in the name of security.

A man in a damaged classroom after an attack at the University of Kabul, Afghanistan. November 3, 2020.Photo: Reuters
A man in a damaged classroom after an attack at the University of Kabul, Afghanistan. November 3, 2020.Photo: Reuters

In 2020, the Afghan government introduced amendments to the law on nongovernmental organizations. The first draft, seen by Foreign Policy, dropped the term "independence" from defining the NGOs and proposed conditions that made it harder to secure funds. The draft was rejected by nongovernmental organizations as well as embassies of Western countries in Kabul. The second draft is still under review.

"The current government is in love with control and authority, showing off that they are in full control of everything in Kabul and nobody is here to challenge them," said Jawad Zawulistani, the managing director of the Afghanistan Human Rights and Democracy Organization, an NGO in Kabul.

As the peace talks progressed, the Afghan government portrayed itself as a defender of liberal values against the extremist Taliban, who seek to build an Islamic emirate. Many fear that the government uses the liberal values as a cover for its attempt to gain the upper hand in power-sharing with the Taliban. "As long as the values serve their interests, the values are defended," Zawulistani said. "We are dealing with two unprincipled groups that seek to monopolize power."

The Taliban, on the other hand, have shown little willingness to compromise on their hard-line Islamism. Over the course of two years of efforts to gain international legitimacy, spokesmen for the Taliban have talked about their commitment to respect women's rights, human rights, and freedom of speech "in the light of Islam." The light of Islam, however, meant the Taliban's interpretation of Islam rather than liberal values.

The United States is now facing the dilemma of whether to withdraw from the country and end the conflict without giving up on liberal values, especially democracy. As the United States is portraying itself, again, as a defender of democracy in a world where democracy is in retreat, the Biden administration has leverage to push for democracy in the political settlement between the Afghan government and the Taliban.

Experts argue that neither the Afghan government nor the Taliban can govern Afghanistan without U.S. money. Afghan liberals argue that the money should be conditioned on the commitment of power brokers to respect a democratic sphere, allowing young Afghans to form grassroots civil society groups that will thrive in the long run.

The alternative is grim: Without genuine U.S. support for liberal values, the country is set to go back to the Taliban era—this time with the current Afghan government as part of the Taliban regime.


Ezzatullah Mehrdad is a freelance journalist based in Kabul. He writes investigative and explanatory features on Afghanistan. Twitter: @EzzatMehrdad


Disclaimer: This article first appeared on Foreign Policy, and is published by special syndication arrangement

Foreign Policy

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Inflation drains Tk50,000cr from bank savings
    Inflation drains Tk50,000cr from bank savings
  • HC asks why WB would suspend Padma Bridge funding if no conspiracy
    HC asks why WB would suspend Padma Bridge funding if no conspiracy
  • CID to seek 10 days remand for Tiktoker who removed nuts of Padma Bridge
    CID to seek 10 days remand for Tiktoker who removed nuts of Padma Bridge

MOST VIEWED

  • Volodymyr Yermolenko. Sketch: TBS
    From Pushkin to Putin: Russian literature’s imperial ideology
  • Farida Akhter. Sketch: TBS
    Bt Cotton approval. Another alarming threat?
  • Sketch: TBS
    The UN knows Afghanistan is messed up. But it’s keeping mum
  • Sketch: TBS
    A legal and political analysis of World Bank’s Padma Bridge snub
  • Sketch: TBS
    Time for a macro policy change?
  • Mariana Mazzucato and Alan Donnelly. Sketch: TBS
    How the G7 could help the debt-distressed

Related News

  • Ending North Korea’s isolation is the only solution left
  • Bangladesh ready to engage with everyone who wishes no harm: Momen
  • New Philippine President Marcos is no Duterte on foreign policy
  • Bangladesh should prioritise its own interest
  • In modern war, short-sellers aren’t on the sidelines

Features

Photo: Collected

Redmi 10C- Best Budget smartphone with one (big) compromise

1h | Brands
Photo caption: Bondstein Technologies founders Mir Shahrukh Islam (right) and Zafir Shafiee Chowdhury. Photo: Noor-A-Alam

Bondstein Technologies: From Dhaka College science club to Forbes 30 under 30 list

1h | Panorama
Photo: Collected

Samsung Dryer: Taking clean clothes to a new level

3h | Brands
Transparent sticky notes. Photo: Collected

A new layer to annotations with transparent sticky notes

3h | Brands

More Videos from TBS

How to treat interns at workplace

How to treat interns at workplace

2h | Videos
Jalamije becomes Georgian citizen to play Wimbledon

Jalamije becomes Georgian citizen to play Wimbledon

16h | Videos
Sievierodonetsk falls to Russia

Sievierodonetsk falls to Russia

19h | Videos
'Anondolok' is a fun field of dance,music and culture

'Anondolok' is a fun field of dance,music and culture

21h | Videos

Most Read

1
Padma Bridge from satellite. Photo: Screengrab
Bangladesh

Padma Bridge from satellite 

2
Photo: Prime Minister's Office
Bangladesh

New investment in transports as Padma Bridge set to open

3
Japan cancels financing Matarbari coal project phase 2
Bangladesh

Japan cancels financing Matarbari coal project phase 2

4
Desco wanted to make a bold statement with their new head office building, a physical entity that would be a corporate icon. Photo: Courtesy
Habitat

Desco head office: When commitment to community and environment inspires architecture

5
Photo: TBS
Infrastructure

Gains from Padma Bridge to cross $10b, hope experts

6
20 businesses get nod for $326m foreign loan for expansion
Economy

20 businesses get nod for $326m foreign loan for expansion

EMAIL US
contact@tbsnews.net
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2022
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab
BENEATH THE SURFACE
Vehicles ply the Padma Bridge on Sunday marking the beginning of a new era for the country’s southern region. The bridge was inaugurated on 25 June amid much fanfare. PHOTO: MUMIT M

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net