China’s pro-monopoly antitrust crusade
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Splash
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Long Read
  • Games
  • Epaper
  • More
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Subscribe
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard
SATURDAY, MAY 28, 2022
SATURDAY, MAY 28, 2022
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Splash
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Long Read
  • Games
  • Epaper
  • More
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Subscribe
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
China’s pro-monopoly antitrust crusade

Thoughts

Minxin Pei/ Professor, Claremont McKenna College
02 January, 2021, 12:50 pm
Last modified: 02 January, 2021, 12:59 pm

Related News

  • Keep the South China Sea free, Biden tells Navy graduates
  • China's external portfolio investment assets top 979B USD by end of 2021
  • China reports surplus in international goods trade
  • Hong Kong seeks to revive global banking status with major summit
  • Australia warns against Pacific security pact as China says interference will fail

China’s pro-monopoly antitrust crusade

China's leaders are probably right that reining in the private sector will strengthen their grip on power in the short term. But, in the longer term, the biggest casualty of China’s “antitrust” crackdown may be the one monopoly it is meant to protect: the Communist Party's lock on political power

Minxin Pei/ Professor, Claremont McKenna College
02 January, 2021, 12:50 pm
Last modified: 02 January, 2021, 12:59 pm
One of Alibaba’s apparent offenses is the expansion of financial services offered by its affiliate, financial-technology giant Ant Group, which owns Alipay. Photo: Project Syndicate/Getty Images
One of Alibaba’s apparent offenses is the expansion of financial services offered by its affiliate, financial-technology giant Ant Group, which owns Alipay. Photo: Project Syndicate/Getty Images

The Chinese government's newly launched antitrust probe into Alibaba is probably warranted. The e-commerce giant undoubtedly has a dominant market share and engages in monopolistic practices, such as forcing merchants to make the company their exclusive online distributor or be delisted from its platforms. But other Chinese e-commerce companies have the same rule, and there are worse monopolists in China than Alibaba. So, why is Alibaba being targeted?

One of Alibaba's apparent offenses is the expansion of financial services offered by its affiliate, financial-technology giant Ant Group, which owns Alipay. Beyond being the world's most popular payment app, with 730 million monthly users, Alipay allows consumers to invest, purchase insurance, and secure loans on its platform.

Last October, Ant Group was poised to launch a record-setting $34 billion initial public offering. But the Chinese authorities abruptly halted it, in what was portrayed as a prudent attempt to limit the company's exorbitant market power. The decision to block the IPO reportedly came directly from President Xi Jinping.

Now it appears that Xi's government wants Ant Group to abandon financial services altogether and to confine itself to payment processing. Chinese regulators have provided a litany of justifications for this decision. But the real reason didn't make the list. Payment processing is a low-margin business; no state-owned bank bothers with it. Financial services, by contrast, are highly lucrative – and the territory of state-owned incumbents.

If the Communist Party of China (CPC) were genuinely committed to breaking up monopolies and oligopolies that are stifling market competition, it would put those incumbents in its sights. After all, state-owned enterprises like China Mobile, China National Petroleum Corporation, the State Grid Corporation of China, and the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (the world's largest bank by assets) dominate China's economic landscape to a far greater extent than Alibaba does.

Yet, far from launching anti-monopoly investigations into state-owned enterprises, China's government has recently been pursuing SOE "mega-mergers," thereby boosting their market power even further. The reason is simple: when SOEs succeed, the CPC benefits, both economically and politically. As Xi made clear last April, the SOEs are "important material and political foundations" for so-called socialism with Chinese characteristics, and he plans to make them "strong, better, and bigger."

Allowing private firms to erode SOEs' market share would undermine this objective, not only by naturally weakening the regime's control over critical economic sectors, but also by opening the way for successful private companies to challenge the CPC. And Alibaba – co-founded by Jack Ma, one of China's wealthiest people – is one of the most successful (and innovative) of all. In Xi's eyes, it thus represents a threat to the CPC's political monopoly and the regime that represents it.

To be sure, China's tycoons have made extraordinary efforts to curry favor with or demonstrate their loyalty to the Xi regime. Ma, for one, is a member of the CPC. In 2013, he called the 1989 massacre of peaceful demonstrators in Tiananmen Square the "correct decision." But, as the antitrust investigation into Alibaba shows, China's private-sector elites will never be genuine regime insiders. For the CPC, they are merely temporary custodians of wealth that rightfully belongs to the Party.

Ma's critics might regard the unfolding investigation as comeuppance for his past statements or business practices. But Chinese regulators are unlikely to stop at Alibaba; China's entire private sector has a target on its back. This has serious implications for China's future economic prosperity – and for the CPC itself.

For all their flaws, private firms are the most dynamic players in the Chinese economy. If the CPC cracks down on them, while leaving SOEs alone, private-sector confidence will dwindle, and the economy will become less productive, innovative, and efficient. GDP growth will falter. And the legitimacy of the one-party regime – which has long rested on the promise of prosperity – will deteriorate.

Xi and his colleagues are probably right that, by strengthening the regime's grip on the economy, reining in the private sector will bolster the CPC's political security in the short term. But, in the longer term, the biggest casualty of China's "antitrust" crackdown may well be the one monopoly it is meant to protect: the CPC's lock on political power.


Minxin Pei is Professor of Government at Claremont McKenna College and a non-resident senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States.

Disclaimer: This article first appeared on Project Syndicate, and is published by special syndication arrangement.

South Asia / Global Economy

pro monopoly / antitrust / china / Companies / Chinese tech companies

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Plucking the poultry: New tax regime for the sector on cards
    Plucking the poultry: New tax regime for the sector on cards
  • Dr Zahid Hussain. Illustration: TBS
    The economics of remittance subsidy
  • Starlink is ideal in rural or remote locations where internet access has been unreliable or completely unavailable. Photo: SpaceX
    Time for a reality check: How viable is Starlink in Bangladesh?

MOST VIEWED

  • Is the BJP altering school curriculum to promote Hindu nationalism?
    Is the BJP altering school curriculum to promote Hindu nationalism?
  • Will Netflix meet the same fate as Nokia?
    Will Netflix meet the same fate as Nokia?
  • Illustration: TBS
    Casual misogyny is ingrained in our society
  • Sketch: TBS
    How prepared for a Monkeypox outbreak are we?
  • Illustration: TBS
    Anti-Discrimination Bill 2022: Understanding the state of marginalisation is crucial
  • Ruth Pollard. Sketch: TBS
    Sri Lanka is a small preview of a global default crisis

Related News

  • Keep the South China Sea free, Biden tells Navy graduates
  • China's external portfolio investment assets top 979B USD by end of 2021
  • China reports surplus in international goods trade
  • Hong Kong seeks to revive global banking status with major summit
  • Australia warns against Pacific security pact as China says interference will fail

Features

A male Baya Weaver beating wings. Photo: Enam Ul Haque

Baya Weavers weave: ‘Must be witnessed to be fully credited’

17m | Panorama
Starlink is ideal in rural or remote locations where internet access has been unreliable or completely unavailable. Photo: SpaceX

Time for a reality check: How viable is Starlink in Bangladesh?

1h | Panorama
First Look: Nissan Magnite 1.0L Turbo

First Look: Nissan Magnite 1.0L Turbo

57m | Wheels
Car myths that really need to go away

Car myths that really need to go away

1h | Wheels

More Videos from TBS

Photo: TBS

Education at Tk1 changing lives, making dreams come true

1h | Videos
Photo: TBS

An electricity bill that connects Brahmanbaria with Tripura

1h | Videos
Chapped lips in summer, why?

Chapped lips in summer, why?

1h | Videos
Fear of food crisis sets across the globe

Fear of food crisis sets across the globe

18h | Videos

Most Read

1
Bangladesh at risk of losing ownership of Banglar Samriddhi
Bangladesh

Bangladesh at risk of losing ownership of Banglar Samriddhi

2
Corporates go cashless…tax cut on cards
NBR

Corporates go cashless…tax cut on cards

3
Photo: Courtesy
Panorama

Misfit Technologies: A Singaporean startup rooted firmly in Bangladesh

4
Tk100 for bike, Tk2,400 for bus to cross Padma Bridge
Bangladesh

Tk100 for bike, Tk2,400 for bus to cross Padma Bridge

5
British International Investment (BII) CEO Nick O’Donohoe. Illustration: TBS
Economy

BII to invest $450m in Bangladesh in 5 years

6
Representational image. Picture: Pixabay
Economy

Govt raises regulatory duty to discourage imports of 130 products

The Business Standard
Top
  • Home
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • About Us
  • Bangladesh
  • International
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Economy
  • Sitemap
  • RSS

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net

Copyright © 2022 THE BUSINESS STANDARD All rights reserved. Technical Partner: RSI Lab