Inequality in Cambridge and Chicago
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Sunday
July 03, 2022

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
SUNDAY, JULY 03, 2022
Inequality in Cambridge and Chicago

World+Biz

Angus Deaton
27 December, 2019, 07:45 pm
Last modified: 27 December, 2019, 08:02 pm

Related News

  • Countries that avoided a pandemic inequality disaster
  • Bangladeshi-origin scientist appointed chair of Cambridgeshire branch of Institute of Directors
  • Inequality doesn’t breed populism. Social immobility does
  • Does Inequality Provoke Populism?
  • Are we asking the wrong questions about inequality?

Inequality in Cambridge and Chicago

Chicago economics gave us all a healthy respect for markets; however, it also gave us too little consideration for what the markets cannot do, do badly, or should not be called upon to do at all

Angus Deaton
27 December, 2019, 07:45 pm
Last modified: 27 December, 2019, 08:02 pm
The influence of Chicago economics and of Friedman’s own arguments remain extraordinarily wide. Photo: AFP via LiveMint
The influence of Chicago economics and of Friedman’s own arguments remain extraordinarily wide. Photo: AFP via LiveMint

Many people seem to be losing faith in capitalism, and with it, any faith they had in economists, who are seen as its apologists. The New York Times reporter Binyamin Appelbaum's new book, The Economists' Hour, raises many uncomfortable questions. Did economics take a wrong turn? Did those of us who do not subscribe to its Chicago School neoclassical variant nonetheless allow ourselves to be pushed too far in that direction? Would the world have been a better place if Cambridge economists had achieved more influence, and Chicago economists less? And, by Cambridge, I, of course, mean Cambridge, England.

When I became an economist in Cambridge 50 years ago, economists and philosophers talked to one another, and welfare economics was taught and taken seriously. John Rawls's landmark 1971 work A Theory of Justice was much discussed, and Amartya Sen, Anthony Atkinson, and James Mirrlees, all then in Cambridge, thought about justice and its relationship with income inequality.

Sen, inspired by Kenneth Arrow's Social Choice and Individual Values, which he read as an undergraduate in Calcutta, wrote about social choice theory, relative and absolute poverty, and utilitarianism and its alternatives. Mirrlees solved a version of the question of how to reconcile a preference for equality with the need to respect incentives, and Atkinson showed how to integrate views about inequality with their measurement.

Meanwhile, in the US, the Chicago School was following a different line. No one should doubt the intellectual contributions of Milton Friedman, George Stigler, James Buchanan, and Robert Lucas to economics and political economy, as well as those of Ronald Coase and Richard Posner to law and economics. Yet it is hard to imagine a body of work more antithetical to broad thinking about inequality and justice. Indeed, in the most extreme versions, money becomes the measure of well-being, and justice is nothing more than efficiency. When I came to the US in 1983 and was called out as "unprofessional" for thinking about inequality, I thought of my own reaction years earlier to reading Stigler's 1959 argument that "the professional study of economics makes one politically conservative." I had thought it was a typo; I had never met a conservative economist.

The influence of Chicago economics and of Friedman's own arguments remain extraordinarily wide. Friedman dismissed much of inequality as natural, reflecting the choices of people with heterogeneous tastes.

He believed in equality of opportunity but stridently opposed the estate tax as "a bad tax" that "taxes virtue" and "encourages wasteful spending." More than 700 economists recently endorsed these claims, and today we hear the same arguments against a wealth tax.

For Friedman, who also favoured tax competition between countries, efforts to limit inequality of outcomes would not only stifle freedom but would also result in more inequality. Free markets would produce both freedom and equality.

It doesn't seem to have worked out that way.

Instead, we got a world in which the Sackler family paid themselves more than $12 billion for igniting and promoting an opioid epidemic that has killed hundreds of thousands of Americans. Johnson and Johnson, the makers of Band-Aids and baby powder, grew opium poppies in Tasmania to fuel the epidemic while the US military was targeting the Taliban's opium supply in Afghanistan's Helmand Province.

In 1839, the British sent gunboats to make China safe for British (and Indian) opium smugglers. We have private equity firms buying up ambulance services and staffing hospital emergency rooms with their own physicians so that they can charge "surprise" fees even to patients whose insurance covers that particular hospital.

This is exactly how we would expect unregulated markets to work: establish a local monopoly and charge a high price in the face of inelastic demand by unconscious (sometimes literally so) consumers.

At least in retrospect, it is not surprising that free markets, or at least free markets where government allows rent seeking by the rich, produce not equality but an extractive elite. After all, this is not the first time that utopian rhetoric about freedom has produced an unjust social dystopia.

Appelbaum's best example is the achievement of which Friedman was most proud: the introduction of an all-volunteer military, which I suspect most economists still favour. But is it really a good idea to draw our military from those with less education and fewer opportunities? In 2014, only 7% of enlisted troops had a bachelor's degree, compared with 84% of officers.

Anne Case of Princeton University and I have been exploring widening inequalities between the less and well educated in the US. We have found a growing divergence in wages, labour-force participation, marriage, social isolation, pain, alcoholism, drug deaths, and suicides.

And now the less educated are being asked to risk their lives for an educated elite, who choose where, when, and whom to fight.

We have lost the social connectedness that came from all kinds of people serving together. Listen, for example, to the Nobel laureate economist Robert Solow describe his experience in the army as one of the best and most important periods in his life. If US President Donald Trump were to reject the 2020 election results, or refuse to leave the White House after being impeached and convicted, we may come to regret the social divisions that have given us an enlisted military selected from the places and people who most fervently support him.

Chicago economics gave us all a healthy respect for markets, but it also gave us too little regard for what markets cannot do, do badly, or should not be called upon to do at all. Philosophers have never accepted that money is the sole measure of good, and economists spend too little time reading and listening to them.

But change may be on the horizon. The Nobel laureate economist Peter Diamond was a long-time collaborator of Mirrlees, and his work with Emmanuel Saez is helping to shape plans by US Senator Elizabeth Warren, a leading candidate to challenge Trump in 2020, to re-institute high marginal tax rates on the rich. Whatever the outcome of the 2020 election, more attention to Cambridge economics might help restore faith, not only in capitalism, but also in economics itself.

Angus Deaton is the 2015 Nobel laureate in economics and is professor emeritus of economics and international affairs at Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. He is the author of The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality.

Disclaimer: The article first appeared in project-syndicate.org. Live Mint published it from Project Syndicate.

Top News

inequality / Cambridge / Chicago

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Vehicles ply the Padma Bridge on Sunday marking the beginning of a new era for the country’s southern region. The bridge was inaugurated on 25 June amid much fanfare. PHOTO: MUMIT M
    No possibility of allowing motorcycles on Padma Bridge before Eid: Cabinet Secretary
  • VAT exemption for edible oil likely to get extension till Sept 
    VAT exemption for edible oil likely to get extension till Sept 
  • File Photo: Collected
    Female passengers endure untold sufferings at Kamalapur station

MOST VIEWED

  • Syria's Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad and Iran's Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian attend a news conference in Damascus, Syria July 2, 2022. REUTERS/Firas Makdesi
    Iran ready to offer a political solution to ease Syria-Turkey tension, foreign minister says
  • Picture: Collected
    At least 30 Nigerian soldiers killed in ambush after mine attack
  • A Ryanair aircraft, which was carrying Belarusian opposition blogger and activist Roman Protasevich and diverted to Belarus, where authorities detained him, lands at Vilnius Airport in Vilnius, Lithuania May 23, 2021. Photo: Reuters
    Ryanair cabin crew in Spain announce 12 more days of strikes
  • 10 killed in India's Bihar due to lightning
    10 killed in India's Bihar due to lightning
  • Data on the number of fighters and weapons also changes from analysis to analysis. It also depends on how "weapons" are defined. Photo: Reuters
    Who is winning the Myanmar’s Civil War
  • Attorney Bobby DiCello holds up a photograph of Jayland Walker, the man who was shot dead by Akron Police on June 25, as he speaks on behalf of the Walker family during a press conference at St. Ashworth Temple in Akron, Ohio, U.S. June 30, 2022. Jeff Lange/USA Today Network via REUTERS
    Ohio police officers shot fleeing Black man dozens of times, lawyer says

Related News

  • Countries that avoided a pandemic inequality disaster
  • Bangladeshi-origin scientist appointed chair of Cambridgeshire branch of Institute of Directors
  • Inequality doesn’t breed populism. Social immobility does
  • Does Inequality Provoke Populism?
  • Are we asking the wrong questions about inequality?

Features

A Glittery Eid

A Glittery Eid

2h | Mode
Rise’s target customers are people who crave to express themselves through what they wear, and their clothing line is not relegated to any age range.

Level up your Eid game with Rise

2h | Mode
Stefan Dercon, a Professor of Economics at the University of Oxford and former Chief Economist of the Department of International Development (DFID). Illustration: TBS

Renewing the ‘elite bargain’ for Bangladesh’s future growth

5h | Panorama
The eye-catching commuter: Suzuki Gixxer SF 155

The eye-catching commuter: Suzuki Gixxer SF 155

1d | Wheels

More Videos from TBS

Chirkutt performs on Fete de La Music Fest

Chirkutt performs on Fete de La Music Fest

4h | Videos
Madhuri Sanchita's seed ornaments exhibition

Madhuri Sanchita's seed ornaments exhibition

4h | Videos
Bangabandhu Tunnel to change lives of million

Bangabandhu Tunnel to change lives of million

16h | Videos
Sowari Ghat's fresh fish market

Sowari Ghat's fresh fish market

16h | Videos

Most Read

1
Padma Bridge from satellite. Photo: Screengrab
Bangladesh

Padma Bridge from satellite 

2
Meet the man behind 'Azke amar mon balo nei'
Splash

Meet the man behind 'Azke amar mon balo nei'

3
TBS Illustration
Education

Universities may launch online classes again after Eid

4
Photo: TBS
Bangladesh

Motorcycles banned on Padma Bridge 

5
Photo: Collected
Economy

Tech startup ShopUp bags $65m in Series B4 funding

6
World Bank to give Bangladesh $18b IDA loans in next five years
Economy

World Bank to give Bangladesh $18b IDA loans in next five years

EMAIL US
contact@tbsnews.net
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2022
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab
BENEATH THE SURFACE
Launch operators on various river routes see a steep drop in passengers after the opening of the the Padma Bridge. Photo: TBS

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net