In future wars, the US military will have nowhere to hide
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Splash
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Long Read
  • Games
  • Epaper
  • More
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Subscribe
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard
SUNDAY, MAY 29, 2022
SUNDAY, MAY 29, 2022
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Splash
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Long Read
  • Games
  • Epaper
  • More
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Subscribe
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
In future wars, the US military will have nowhere to hide

World+Biz

Foreign Policy
24 November, 2019, 11:10 am
Last modified: 24 November, 2019, 01:35 pm

Related News

  • Biden signs police order on second anniversary of George Floyd's death
  • US considering $4B additional support for India
  • Bangladesh’s ‘deft’ balancing of US, China and India ties stands out, writes South China Morning Post
  • Quad Summit will review progress of initiatives, says Indian PM ahead of Japan visit
  • China relaxes some Covid test rules for US, other travellers

In future wars, the US military will have nowhere to hide

New technologies enable Russia and China to destroy US bases and logistics networks—including those on the homeland.

Foreign Policy
24 November, 2019, 11:10 am
Last modified: 24 November, 2019, 01:35 pm
A protective blast wall painted by a U.S. military unit stands at an air base in the Persian Gulf on January 8, 20016. Illustration: Foreign Policy
A protective blast wall painted by a U.S. military unit stands at an air base in the Persian Gulf on January 8, 20016. Illustration: Foreign Policy

For most of its history, the United States has had the luxury of fighting its wars from safe havens. No major international battles have taken place on the continental United States in more than two centuries, and its offshore territory has not suffered a serious attack since Japan bombed Pearl Harbor in World War II. For the past few decades, even US bases on foreign soil have faced few conventional military threats.

The unprecedented immunity has enabled a particular American way of war that involves massive assaults launched from nearly invulnerable and geographically removed sanctuaries. In recent wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Serbia, for example, the US military used secure bases and logistics networks stretching from the US heartland to the enemy's borders. From these vast safe spaces, the military was able to pick its battles strategically and churn out air and missile strikes with industrial efficiency. As a result, the outcomes of the immediate wars—if not their aftermaths—were never in doubt.

In future wars, however, new technologies may enable rival great powers, such as China and Russia, to carry out precise and devastating attacks on US military bases and logistics networks, even including those located within the United States itself. Advances in the fields of aerospace, robotics, machine learning, 3D printing, and nanomaterials are creating new classes of missiles and lethal drones that can be launched discreetly, travel great distances, and hamstring massed forces—all for a fraction of the cost of traditional manned weapons.

New hypersonic missiles, for example, combine the speed and range of ballistic missiles with the maneuverability and accuracy of cruise missiles. Unmanned aerial vehicles and underwater gliders have achieved transoceanic range. Algorithms can coordinate swarms of more than 1,000 drones. Carbon 3D printers can produce 1,000 drone bodies a day for less than $10 per copy, and nanomaterials can equip drones with warheads that are twice as powerful as conventional explosives.

The diffusion of these technologies will render the United States' current way of war obsolete. Armed with large and growing arsenals of long-range missiles and armed drones, China and Russia are increasingly capable of denying the US military operational sanctuary. In previous technological eras, striking America's bases required daring raids, which were typically too small and sporadic to dent US combat power, or nuclear missile strikes that would trigger a massive retaliation in kind. Now, however, China and Russia can send hordes of conventional missiles and expendable drones to wreak havoc on America's networks, destroying US weapons platforms while they are on base, cutting US communications links, and wiping out vital fuel and ammunition dumps.

The US military would have trouble quickly responding to such attacks because it is so unprepared for them. Most bases have few, if any, missile defense systems or hardened shelters. Combat aircraft and warships often are parked in the open, side by side. Communications between command centers and soldiers in the field rely heavily on satellites that follow predictable orbits and on undersea cables that are mapped in open sources. The US logistics force consists mainly of unarmed steam-powered vessels, most of which are due to be retired within 15 years, and US warships and submarines cannot be reloaded at sea, so in wartime they have to commute between the combat theater and a handful of ports on US and allied territory.

The United States has the most powerful military in the world by a wide margin but routinely "gets its ass handed to it" in simulated wars.

Such gaping US vulnerabilities combined with rapid technological change have produced something of a paradox: The United States has the most powerful military in the world by a wide margin but routinely "gets its ass handed to it" in simulated wars when Russia or China unleashes its missile and drone forces.

The problem may get even worse. In an effort to counter China's and Russia's anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities, which target the United States' forward-deployed forces, the US military is increasing its dependence on combat systems that require secure bases and logistics networks to function. For example, the United States is spending billions of dollars to produce a new stealth bomber, the B-21, to penetrate A2/AD networks. These exquisite aircraft are a decade away from being operational, but Russia and China may already be able to destroy them on the ground. Both countries may have put advanced cruise missiles in shipping containers that could strike the future home of the B-21—Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri—from the Gulf of Mexico. Another example: The US Navy plans to build hundreds of new warships over the next 30 years and disperse them in small groups. These distributed maritime operations will reduce US exposure to enemy A2/AD systems, but they also will run ragged US logistics forces, which will have to shuttle supplies to hundreds of ships spread over millions of square miles. China and Russia already have plans to hit these logistics lines with missiles and smart mines.

It is past time for the US military to prepare to fight without sanctuaries. Instead of waiting for wars to break out and then surging vulnerable aircraft carriers and armored brigades overseas, the United States should preposition missile launchers and armed drones on allied territory and merchant ships in potential conflict zones. For wars against Russia and China, that means near the Baltics and in the East and South China seas. These missiles and drones would act as high-tech minefields. They could destroy Chinese and Russian power projection forces but would be difficult for either country to eliminate and would not require large crews or logistics tails. This approach capitalizes on a fundamental asymmetry in the war aims of the United States and its adversaries; whereas China and Russia need to seize control of territory (for example, Taiwan or part of the Baltics) to achieve their main objectives, the United States just needs to deny them that control, a mission that modern missiles and drones are well suited to perform.

The United States has the technology to make this strategy work, but powerful domestic players are hesitant to commit to it. The Navy wants big warships, not missile barges. The Air Force favors manned aircraft, not autonomous drones. Defense contractors want to build expensive power projection platforms, not cheap munitions; and many members of Congress share this preference because fancy platforms and decades-long procurement cycles produce jobs in their districts. Cutting through this logjam and updating the American way of war for a new technological age will require a strong commitment from top officials in the Defense Department and steady pressure from an educated public. Historically, the United States has overhauled its military posture only after suffering a major shock. It would be tragic if the next shock involved losing a war to a weaker but more technologically savvy opponent.

Top News

Future / wars / US

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Finance projects export fall, remittance rise
    Finance projects export fall, remittance rise
  • Photo: TBS
    After 72-hour ultimatum, health directorate goes after illegal medical facilities 
  • Photo: Bloomberg
    Direct shipping now to Netherlands 

MOST VIEWED

  • The palms of a monkeypox case patient from Lodja, a city located within the Katako-Kombe Health Zone, are seen during a health investigation in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 1997. Brian W.J. Mahy/CDC/Handout via REUTERS
    Disease experts call on WHO, governments for more action on monkeypox
  • The guy on the right just did a solid for the guy on the left.Photographer: Alex Kraus/Bloomberg
    Rishi Sunak’s helicopter drop makes the bank of England’s life easier
  • Chinese President Xi Jinping and United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet are seen on a giant screen broadcasting news footage of their virtual meeting at a shopping complex in Beijing, China May 25, 2022. REUTERS/Carlos Garcia Rawlins
    UN rights chief says she urged China to review counter-terrorism policies
  • A satellite image shows troops and equipment occupy the village of Kolodyazi, north of Lyman, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, in Donetsk region, Ukraine on 26 May 2022. Picture taken May 26, 2022. Satellite image 2022 Maxar Technologies/Handout via Reuters
    Russian gains in Ukraine's east indicate a shift in momentum in the war
  • Ukrainian military medics transport a wounded soldier after treatment at a field hospital in Popasna, Ukraine, on May 8.Photographer: Chris McGrath/Getty Images/Bloomberg
    Russian wins in eastern Ukraine spark debate over course of war
  • Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with members of the Delovaya Rossiya (Business Russia) All-Russian Public Organization at the Kremlin, in Moscow, Russia, 3 February, 2022. PHOTO: Sputnik/Aleksey Nikolskyi/Kremlin via REUTERS
    Putin says he's willing to discuss resuming Ukrainian grain shipments

Related News

  • Biden signs police order on second anniversary of George Floyd's death
  • US considering $4B additional support for India
  • Bangladesh’s ‘deft’ balancing of US, China and India ties stands out, writes South China Morning Post
  • Quad Summit will review progress of initiatives, says Indian PM ahead of Japan visit
  • China relaxes some Covid test rules for US, other travellers

Features

Women voluntarily joined the peaceful procession and protested by wearing clothing of their own choice. Photo: Trishia Nashtaran

The unhealthy obsession with what women wear

1h | Panorama
Illustration: Freepik

Bangladesh is on the verge of destigmatising menstruation

5h | Features
Photo: Collected

The death of Davos?

11h | Panorama
A male Baya Weaver beating wings. Photo: Enam Ul Haque

Baya Weavers weave: ‘Must be witnessed to be fully credited’

15h | Panorama

More Videos from TBS

Attorney General's suggestion to reduce case clutter

Attorney General's suggestion to reduce case clutter

5h | Videos
Russian forces take Liman city of Ukraine

Russian forces take Liman city of Ukraine

5h | Videos
JU food prices spike, students suffer

JU food prices spike, students suffer

5h | Videos
5% tax on poultry farmers earning above Tk10 lakh

5% tax on poultry farmers earning above Tk10 lakh

5h | Videos

Most Read

1
Bangladesh Bank GM, DGM’s designation changed
Banking

Bangladesh Bank GM, DGM’s designation changed

2
Corporates go cashless…tax cut on cards
NBR

Corporates go cashless…tax cut on cards

3
Photo: Courtesy
Panorama

Misfit Technologies: A Singaporean startup rooted firmly in Bangladesh

4
British International Investment (BII) CEO Nick O’Donohoe. Illustration: TBS
Economy

BII to invest $450m in Bangladesh in 5 years

5
Representational image. Picture: Pixabay
Economy

Govt raises regulatory duty to discourage imports of 130 products

6
Photo: Collected
Industry

Spanish recycled cotton producer opens new facility in Bangladesh

The Business Standard
Top
  • Home
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • About Us
  • Bangladesh
  • International
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Economy
  • Sitemap
  • RSS

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net

Copyright © 2022 THE BUSINESS STANDARD All rights reserved. Technical Partner: RSI Lab