Why 25 previous conferences have failed to stop climate change
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Friday
August 12, 2022

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
FRIDAY, AUGUST 12, 2022
Why 25 previous conferences have failed to stop climate change

Panorama

David Fickling, Bloomberg
29 October, 2021, 02:05 pm
Last modified: 29 October, 2021, 02:17 pm

Related News

  • Climate change compensation fight brews ahead of COP27 summit
  • US Senate's $430 billion climate bill to add tax on stock buybacks
  • China warns that its temperatures are rising faster than global average
  • Pakistanis plant trees to provide relief from scorching sun
  • How to feed the planet

Why 25 previous conferences have failed to stop climate change

Countries at international conferences are not in it for show or charity. They will only sign up to agreements that they perceive to be in their best interests

David Fickling, Bloomberg
29 October, 2021, 02:05 pm
Last modified: 29 October, 2021, 02:17 pm
Why 25 previous conferences have failed to stop climate change

There have been 25 conferences under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change since the body first met in 1995. Over that period, some 894 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide, about 37 percent of all greenhouse pollution in human history, has been emitted. 

What makes anyone think that the 26th meeting starting on 31 October – COP26 – will be any more effective?

The answer lies in the age-old challenges of forging major international agreements – and it may be more hopeful than you think. 

One adage of multilateralism is that effective global accords can be deep and narrow, or broad and shallow, but will not work if they try to be both deep and broad. 

The 1987 Montreal Protocol, which controlled chemicals that damage the ozone layer, is a classic example of the former. The treaty's effects are deep - it is legally binding on every UN member state and on its own will reduce global warming by as much as one degree Celsius – but its scope is narrow, in regulating a single niche set of compounds.

The UN's human rights treaties, on the other hand, set sweepingly broad global standards for relations between the individual and the state. Their enforcement, however, is shallow, with even signatories often appearing to treat them as worthless paper promises. 

Nine of the 10 countries rated lowest for gender equality under the Women Peace and Security Index have ratified the UN's Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women.

This dichotomy puts climate talks at a disadvantage from the start. Their intent is stunningly broad: remaking the energy systems that have powered the entire planet since the Industrial Revolution, as well as land-use practices we have employed since the Stone Age. At the same time, enforcement must be deep, because the world cannot afford a repeat of the emissions trajectory we have been on since that first meeting.

To compound the problem, individual nations are deeply divided on how to proceed. This is best exemplified by the split between the Group of Seven major advanced economies – which together have accounted for about 53 percent of historical carbon emissions – and the Group of 77 developing nations. Controlling emissions in post-industrial economies whose populations have peaked is a far easier business than it is in nations just embarking on the rapid increase in population, income and industrial activity that we call development.

The G-77, whose largest representatives include China, India, Brazil and Indonesia, is often portrayed as the wrecker of negotiations: refusing to accept constraints on the ability to pollute and arguing that richer nations must cut their emissions faster before poorer ones agree to any absolute limits. G-7 countries are accused of making no allowances for the leg-up their own economies received from decades of emissions, and haranguing developing nations that have few alternative options.

This division has frequently shaped the talks. 

The core of the Kyoto Protocol, the first major climate agreement adopted at COP3 in 1997, was in essence a treaty between the G-7 plus the former Soviet Union, Australia and New Zealand. If action on climate change is going to be hostage to the resolution of centuries-old disputes between colonial nations and their former empires, though, the prospects for the planet are grim, indeed.

Believe it or not, there is still reason for optimism. 

One surprising fact about Kyoto is that an agreement widely considered a failure was in many ways a success. The countries that remained in the deal didn't just meet the target of a 5 percent reduction in emissions over the two decades following 1990 – they went well beyond it, with reductions of 11 percent that deepened to 17 percent by 2019. That fits well with evidence that ambitious goals are more likely to be achieved than timid ones.

The problem with Kyoto was not that countries did not reach the targets they had committed to - it is that too few committed to targets at all. Once you include the US and Canada, which pulled out of the protocol, that 11 percent drop in emissions narrows to a 2.2 percent fall. Throw in the developing economies that were excluded at the outset, and the picture is even worse. 

While fossil-fuel emissions from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development rich-countries' club fell about 4.4 percent between 1998 (the year after Kyoto was signed) and 2019, those from the rest of the world more than doubled.

Infograph: Bloomberg
Infograph: Bloomberg

That points to the last reason for cautious optimism. For most of the time these meetings have been taking place, delegates' pre-eminent national interest in low-cost energy has been most easily served by remaining wedded to fossil fuels, while the physical risks of climate change have seemed remote and theoretical. Both sides of that equation are now changing with blistering speed.

Renewables are the cheapest source of new power generation for two-thirds of the world's population, and even undercut existing fossil-fired power in China, India and much of Europe, according to BloombergNEF. Electric vehicles made up 17% of car sales in the European Union in the June quarter, and 13% in China. 

While the current energy crisis will cause a short-term rise in fossil emissions to plug short supplies of power, China is redoubling its efforts to rein in polluting industries and India has warned that high oil prices will speed the transition to zero-carbon technologies.

On the other side of the ledger, recent floods in China, Germany and India, and wildfires in Canada, plus the most active Atlantic hurricane season on record last year are evidence of the way the effects of climate change are growing ever closer. In just the US, there have been 18 separate billion-dollar weather and climate disasters in 2021 alone.

Countries at international conferences are not in it for show or charity. They will only sign up to agreements that they perceive to be in their best interests. For most of the past three decades, the raw economics of energy and climate have stood in the way of making a worthwhile deal. 

Finally, now, there is an ill wind at negotiators' backs.

Features / Top News

Carbon emission / Bloomberg / COP26 / Climate / Climate Change Conference (COP26)

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Default loans jump Tk22,000cr in six months
    Default loans jump Tk22,000cr in six months
  • File Photo: Mohammad Minhaj Uddin/TBS
    ICDs hike imports handling charge by 35%
  • A shopping cart is seen in a supermarket as inflation affected consumer prices in Manhattan, New York City, US on 10 June 2022. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly
    Is global inflation nearing a peak?

MOST VIEWED

  • Illustration: TBS
    Removal of Treasury chiefs: Panic or justified?
  • Bye bye! Photographer: Michael Zarrilli/Getty Images North America via Bloomberg
    Three major takeaways from the FBI search on Trump’s home
  • Photo: Noor A Alam/TBS
    Big dreams in small rooms: The aspiring nurses of Geneva Camp
  • Now is the right time to use these idle-sitting solar panels when load-shedding is very frequent. Photo: Noor a Alam
    How solar market fraud is impeding renewable growth
  • International relations do not depend on state to state friendship but on mutual benefits, especially for the stronger state. Photo: Bloomberg
    Game of geopolitics: No permanent friends or foes
  • Deeply depressed and afraid of living in total darkness, the Noakhali-based housewife Rasheda desires nothing but to get her vision back. Photo: Noor-A-Alam
    Blind people need 25,000 corneas. Sandhani gets around 25

Related News

  • Climate change compensation fight brews ahead of COP27 summit
  • US Senate's $430 billion climate bill to add tax on stock buybacks
  • China warns that its temperatures are rising faster than global average
  • Pakistanis plant trees to provide relief from scorching sun
  • How to feed the planet

Features

Bye bye! Photographer: Michael Zarrilli/Getty Images North America via Bloomberg

Three major takeaways from the FBI search on Trump’s home

18h | Panorama
Photo: Noor A Alam/TBS

Big dreams in small rooms: The aspiring nurses of Geneva Camp

21h | Panorama
Illustration: TBS

How to deal with toxic people at work

22h | Pursuit
Women were more likely to report leaving the workforce between March 2020 and September 2021 than their male counterparts. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG

Being single and smart is bad for your career if you are a woman

21h | Pursuit

More Videos from TBS

Control on liquor import boosts local Carew sales

Control on liquor import boosts local Carew sales

11h | Videos
Is Bangladesh losing opportunity to sent more expats to the Middle East?

Is Bangladesh losing opportunity to sent more expats to the Middle East?

12h | Videos
When hassles at airport will come to an end?

When hassles at airport will come to an end?

14h | Videos
How to spot a Pyramid Scheme?

How to spot a Pyramid Scheme?

15h | Videos

Most Read

1
Dollar crisis: BB orders removal of 6 banks’ treasury chiefs 
Banking

Dollar crisis: BB orders removal of 6 banks’ treasury chiefs 

2
Diesel price hiked by Tk34 per litre, Octane by Tk46
Energy

Diesel price hiked by Tk34 per litre, Octane by Tk46

3
Photo: Collected
Transport

Will Tokyo’s traffic model solve Dhaka’s gridlocks?

4
Arrest warrant against Habib Group chairman, 4 others 
Crime

Arrest warrant against Habib Group chairman, 4 others 

5
File Photo: State Minister for Power, Energy and Mineral Resources Nasrul Hamid
Energy

All factories to remain closed once a week under rationing system

6
Anwar Group looks beyond slowdown – invests Tk5,000cr
Economy

Anwar Group looks beyond slowdown – invests Tk5,000cr

EMAIL US
[email protected]
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2022
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - [email protected]

For advertisement- [email protected]