A scary plan to revise the definition of death
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Splash
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Long Read
  • Games
  • Epaper
  • More
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Subscribe
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard
SUNDAY, MAY 29, 2022
SUNDAY, MAY 29, 2022
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Splash
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Long Read
  • Games
  • Epaper
  • More
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Subscribe
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
A scary plan to revise the definition of death

Panorama

Ramesh Ponnuru, Bloomberg
17 June, 2021, 01:00 pm
Last modified: 17 June, 2021, 01:00 pm

Related News

  • People bid adieu to Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury
  • Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury laid to eternal rest
  • Bangladeshi shot dead by assailants in Africa
  • Bangladeshi student dies after being ‘pushed’ on NY subway tracks
  • Internet suspended as murder triggers communal tensions in Rajasthan’s Bhilwara

A scary plan to revise the definition of death

People may be less willing to agree to be organ donors if they believe the quest for organs changes how patients are treated

Ramesh Ponnuru, Bloomberg
17 June, 2021, 01:00 pm
Last modified: 17 June, 2021, 01:00 pm
At death’s door, maybe, but you are still alive. Photo: Bloomberg
At death’s door, maybe, but you are still alive. Photo: Bloomberg

Death can't be denied but it can be edited.

In 1981, the Uniform Law Commission proposed a model law for the determination of death. It says that individuals have died when they have experienced an irreversible end to either their respiratory and circulatory functions or their brain functions. Most states have adopted this definition, and the rest adopted it in substance if not precise wording.

The commission is now considering whether the definition should be revised. One proposal has been gaining influence but has dangers that ought to keep it from prevailing.

That proposal has three crucial elements. It would specify that current medical guidelines should be followed in diagnosing brain death, whereas current law is silent on that point. It would list criteria for brain death that would allow it to be declared even when patients show some function in the hypothalamus, a structure deep in the brain. And it would allow doctors to dispense with getting a proxy's consent before conducting an apnea test, that is, checking whether the patient can breathe spontaneously as an indication of whether brain death has occurred.

The revisions offer several potential advantages. They would bring the law into better alignment with medical practice: The law specifies that "all functions of the entire brain" have to have irreversibly stopped, while the medical guidelines for declaring death do not require checking hypothalamic function.

Why not align the two the other way, by having the guidelines follow the current law? Rigorously following it, as one author of the proposal has explained, would probably lead to fewer organs being available for transplantation, since doctors would not be allowed to remove organs from patients with that function. Hence the preference for changing the law.

The revisions would also advance the law's core purpose of uniformity. The current law's silence about how brain death is diagnosed means that someone could be found legally dead in Nevada even if ruled alive in Kansas.

Despite all the arguments in favour of the revisions, more than 100 experts in medicine, law, philosophy and bioethics have signed a statement of opposition organized by D. Alan Shewmon, an emeritus professor of pediatric neurology at UCLA. The signatories come from around the world — the statement notes that developments in US law can have global "ripple effects" — and have widely varying views about how death should be determined and about related issues.

John Finnis, an emeritus professor of philosophy at Oxford University and a law professor at Notre Dame who is well-known for his belief in the sanctity of all human life, signed. So did Peter Singer, a professor of bioethics at Princeton University who expressly rejects the sanctity of life principle and is known for his utilitarian arguments for the moral permissibility of abortion, infanticide and euthanasia.

The Shewmon statement raises a serious objection to each part of the revision. It contends that the current guidelines pose an unacceptably high risk of classifying people as dead when they aren't. They could have this effect, for example, in certain cases in which blood flow has drops to a level that prevents brain function but might be brought back to a higher level. Patients could also be categorized as dead, according to the statement, if they are judged comatose because they are unresponsive even though they are possibly conscious.

It notes multiple examples of patients surviving even after meeting the guidelines' criteria for death and points out that there would likely be more if meeting those criteria did not so often lead to the withdrawal of medical support or the removal of organs.

The objecting experts insist that informed consent is necessary for an apnea test, "given that many procedures that are much more beneficial and much less risky require" it. If a patient is in sufficient peril, the test can cause the brain death it is attempting to diagnose.

They even suggest, although they do not explicitly say, that the test is simply unethical. ("It is doubtful that any proxy, after being truly informed about the procedure, would ever consent to it.")

Singer's distinctive perspective is worth considering. He has no objection in principle to taking the organs of living human beings and thereby causing their deaths; he has written that it would sometimes be the right thing to do. He does not, however, favour changing our standards for what constitutes death to obscure what we would be doing. He wants us to do it with a clear understanding.

Those of us who disagree with him on the ethical question should agree all the more with him on the definitional one. There is even a utilitarian argument to be deployed here: People may be less willing to designate themselves as potential organ donors if they believe the quest for usable organs is changing the way patients are treated.

"You start blurring those lines and the worry on the part of the family members starts to be, 'You're just encouraging me to take him off the vent so you can get his organs,'" says Aaron Kheriaty, director of medical ethics at UCI Health.

But even that weighty consideration is ultimately secondary. We should strenuously resist a system of classifying who is alive that is underinclusive — something that is, after all, literally the stuff of nightmares.


Disclaimer: This article first appeared on Bloomberg, and is published by special syndication arrangement

Features

death / dead / Definition of death

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Patients opting to delay crucial treatment amid rising costs
    Patients opting to delay crucial treatment amid rising costs
  • Bankers unhappy with uniform exchange rate
    Bankers unhappy with uniform exchange rate
  • Photo: PID
    Brand Bangladesh as powerful peace promoting country: PM

MOST VIEWED

  • CholPori is planning to roll out their platform in schools so teachers can utilise their tools for the classroom. Photo: Courtesy
    CholPori: Where learning is practical, fun and inclusive
  • Women voluntarily joined the peaceful procession and protested by wearing clothing of their own choice. Photo: Trishia Nashtaran
    The unhealthy obsession with what women wear
  • Photo: Collected
    The death of Davos?
  • A male Baya Weaver beating wings. Photo: Enam Ul Haque
    Baya Weavers weave: ‘Must be witnessed to be fully credited’
  • Starlink is ideal in rural or remote locations where internet access has been unreliable or completely unavailable. Photo: SpaceX
    Time for a reality check: How viable is Starlink in Bangladesh?
  • The perfect time for newborn photography is between the first five and 14 days when a baby’s bones are the most malleable for posing. Photo: Courtesy
    Is there a market for newborn photography in the country? Studio Picturerific says yes

Related News

  • People bid adieu to Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury
  • Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury laid to eternal rest
  • Bangladeshi shot dead by assailants in Africa
  • Bangladeshi student dies after being ‘pushed’ on NY subway tracks
  • Internet suspended as murder triggers communal tensions in Rajasthan’s Bhilwara

Features

Aiman R Khan. Illustration: TBS

Why ‘marry your rapist’ court orders are not always what they seem

2h | Thoughts
Photo: Collected

Top 3 The Ordinary products that give extraordinary results

4h | Mode
Photo: Courtesy

KVN Beauty: Channel your inner Bangalee baddie

4h | Mode
CholPori is planning to roll out their platform in schools so teachers can utilise their tools for the classroom. Photo: Courtesy

CholPori: Where learning is practical, fun and inclusive

3h | Panorama

More Videos from TBS

Photo: TBS

Tips to help you become a successful lawyer

5h | Videos
People bid adieu to Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury

People bid adieu to Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury

5h | Videos
Photo: TBS

Harassment over 'indecent clothing': Women gather at Narsingdi railway station to protest, show solidarity

5h | Videos
Attorney General's suggestion to reduce case clutter

Attorney General's suggestion to reduce case clutter

18h | Videos

Most Read

1
Bangladesh Bank GM, DGM’s designation changed
Banking

Bangladesh Bank GM, DGM’s designation changed

2
Corporates go cashless…tax cut on cards
NBR

Corporates go cashless…tax cut on cards

3
Photo: Courtesy
Panorama

Misfit Technologies: A Singaporean startup rooted firmly in Bangladesh

4
British International Investment (BII) CEO Nick O’Donohoe. Illustration: TBS
Economy

BII to invest $450m in Bangladesh in 5 years

5
Representational image. Picture: Pixabay
Economy

Govt raises regulatory duty to discourage imports of 130 products

6
Photo: Collected
Industry

Spanish recycled cotton producer opens new facility in Bangladesh

The Business Standard
Top
  • Home
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • About Us
  • Bangladesh
  • International
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Economy
  • Sitemap
  • RSS

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net

Copyright © 2022 THE BUSINESS STANDARD All rights reserved. Technical Partner: RSI Lab