Work from home is ending. But the pandemic is still here.
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Splash
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Long Read
  • Games
  • Epaper
  • More
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Subscribe
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard
TUESDAY, MAY 24, 2022
TUESDAY, MAY 24, 2022
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Splash
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Long Read
  • Games
  • Epaper
  • More
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Subscribe
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
Work from home is ending. But the pandemic is still here.

Panorama

Emily Oster, Bloomberg
17 September, 2020, 10:30 am
Last modified: 17 September, 2020, 11:37 am

Related News

  • Apple’s chief of machine learning quits over return-to-office policy
  • Omicron 'stealth' Covid variant BA.2 now dominant globally
  • Shanghai tightens Covid lockdown on second day of curbs
  • WHO says global rise in Covid cases is 'tip of the iceberg'
  • What really happens when workers are given a flexible hybrid schedule?

Work from home is ending. But the pandemic is still here.

Return-to-the-office plans suggest employers expect we’ll just have to get used to living with Covid-19

Emily Oster, Bloomberg
17 September, 2020, 10:30 am
Last modified: 17 September, 2020, 11:37 am
No more sweatpants. Photo: Bloomberg
No more sweatpants. Photo: Bloomberg

JPMorgan Chase & Co. announced last week that at least some employees — largely those in sales and trading — would be expected to be back in the office September 21. Although many organizations have encouraged employees to come back, JPMorgan's move was notable because it was framed not as a choice, but an expectation. Exceptions will be made, but this is an opt-out, not an opt-in. Other employers are wondering how hard to push people to return, and employees are wondering if their at-home time is ending. 

There is some feeling of abruptness to this. If it wasn't safe to go back in August, why is it safe now? In some locations (for example, Texas and Georgia) cases have dropped in the last month, so it's possible to see why returning to work might have become a better idea. But JPMorgan's announcement was about its offices in New York. Cases there have been stable and low since the middle of June. This makes the decision seem arbitrary; that employers have just decided "it's time" rather than evaluating the risks to employees. 

One hallmark of good decision-making is consistency. Changing your decision when nothing has actually changed is not consistent. In my view, though, something has changed. But it's not the facts about the virus. Instead, it's how we're thinking about the alternatives. The choice of whether or not to open a workplace — or to open a school, or to go to the hairdresser — depends crucially on defining what will happen in the "or not" scenario. 

For months we've been, either explicitly or implicitly, operating under the assumption that — pretty soon — this will "end." That is: If we just wait until a vaccine is approved, or rapid antigen tests are available, we'll be able to reopen everything normally. Decisions not to reopen workplaces over the summer were, I think, rooted in the expectation that if we just waited a bit longer, things could be more normal. Employers wouldn't have to go through all the work of setting up a Covid-safe workplace.   

Because re-opening workplaces before a vaccine is available is going to require a lot of additional work — more cleaning, more distancing, weird partial pod-oriented schedules, messing around with the elevator settings. Masks! Routine testing! People will object. It will be annoying, to say nothing of the fact that some employees are likely to get Covid-19, whether or not they get it at work. Investing in this sort of office homecoming really wouldn't make sense if everything is going to return to normal in a few weeks.

When we ask what's changed, I think the answer is that we have started to realize — and I know we do not want to hear this — that it's not a few weeks, or even a few months. Employers have realized they need to plan for the long term. It's dawning on all of us that there is not an "end" in sight. Vaccine trials are moving along, and it does seem possible we will have some vaccine by the end of the year. But it will take time to vaccinate everyone, and the vaccine will not be perfect. Antigen tests are here, but they aren't a magic bullet and they are not yet widely available. I think Dr. Fauci may have said it best when he said that we'll be dealing with this is some way for the next 18 months … at least.

With that realization, employers now face the choice of opening "Covid-safe" now or waiting perhaps 18 months to open "normally." This is a very different choice. Although a few companies (tech firms, largely) have decided that work from home is a long-term solution, others are realizing that simply won't work for them. JPMorgan says its internal data show workers are not as productive from home. The result is a decision to make the investments to bring people back as safely as possible in this new normal. These investments in safety make a lot more sense than they would if we were going to return to normal in a few weeks.

We must acknowledge that the outcome is uncertain. It is possible that cases will increase if we open workplaces. Employers will need to be diligent about monitoring, open to backtracking, and willing to learn from what works and what doesn't. This learning, too, has more value as we acknowledge a longer road ahead.

This logic extends to other types of reopenings. Schools are one obvious example, but so are things like gyms, restaurants and other businesses. Keeping schools closed now under the assumption that you'll be able to open normally in October may make sense; once we realize that we're looking at an entire academic year at least, it may make sense to invest in ways to conduct in-person instruction more safely.

I can hear the howls of protest already. People will object that this is privileging the economy over health, and it's morally reprehensible to consider asking people to return to work (or school, or anything else) until we are sure it is 100% safe. I see this point, but staying closed also has serious risks in terms of employment, income and, yes, health — both mental and physical. There are no perfect options here. Making good choices among the many imperfect options requires realism about how long this pandemic is likely to last.


Emily Oster, is a professor of economics at Brown University. She is the author of "Cribsheet" and "Expecting Better."


Disclaimer: This article first appeared on bloomberg.com, and is published by special syndication arrangement

Analysis / Top News

work from home / Coronavirus Pandemic

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Corporates go cashless…tax cut on cards
    Corporates go cashless…tax cut on cards
  • Rising revenue collection a false dawn, economists say
    Rising revenue collection a false dawn, economists say
  • Why we must resist geoeconomic fragmentation—and how
    Why we must resist geoeconomic fragmentation—and how

MOST VIEWED

  • Musk is denying the sexual harassment allegation that surfaced this week. Photo: Bloomberg
    Elon Musk’s crazily banal week 
  • Illustration: TBS
    ‘The move to introduce DVS has changed the entire spectrum of financial auditing’
  • At present, 80% of the umbrella market is dominated by Chinese products. Photo: Noor-A-Alam
    The canopy of change: How Chinese umbrellas drove out Bangla Chhatas 
  • Why everybody wants to be like TikTok
    Why everybody wants to be like TikTok
  • Illustration: TBS
    How the ban on porn sites spawned a local cybersex industry
  • Photo: Courtesy
    Misfit Technologies: A Singaporean startup rooted firmly in Bangladesh

Related News

  • Apple’s chief of machine learning quits over return-to-office policy
  • Omicron 'stealth' Covid variant BA.2 now dominant globally
  • Shanghai tightens Covid lockdown on second day of curbs
  • WHO says global rise in Covid cases is 'tip of the iceberg'
  • What really happens when workers are given a flexible hybrid schedule?

Features

Musk is denying the sexual harassment allegation that surfaced this week. Photo: Bloomberg

Elon Musk’s crazily banal week 

15h | Panorama
Asus Zenbook 14 Flip OLED: A touch of brilliance to your life

Asus Zenbook 14 Flip OLED: A touch of brilliance to your life

18h | Brands
Keep your phone by your side with this armband

Keep your phone by your side with this armband

16h | Brands
Are Focallure gel masks worth the hype?

Are Focallure gel masks worth the hype?

17h | Brands

More Videos from TBS

Why are Duranta TV shows popular?

Why are Duranta TV shows popular?

10h | Videos
Donbas is hell, says Zelenskiy

Donbas is hell, says Zelenskiy

11h | Videos
Threat of Monkeypox on the horizon

Threat of Monkeypox on the horizon

12h | Videos
Mosque of Mughal period in Gazipur

Mosque of Mughal period in Gazipur

12h | Videos

Most Read

1
Tk100 for bike, Tk2,400 for bus to cross Padma Bridge
Bangladesh

Tk100 for bike, Tk2,400 for bus to cross Padma Bridge

2
A packet of US five-dollar bills is inspected at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing in Washington March 26, 2015. REUTERS/Gary Cameron
Banking

Dollar hits Tk100 mark in open market

3
Bangladesh at risk of losing ownership of Banglar Samriddhi
Bangladesh

Bangladesh at risk of losing ownership of Banglar Samriddhi

4
PK Halder: How a scamster rose from humble beginnings to a Tk11,000cr empire
Crime

PK Halder: How a scamster rose from humble beginnings to a Tk11,000cr empire

5
BSEC launches probe against Abul Khayer Hero and allies
Stocks

BSEC launches probe against Abul Khayer Hero and allies

6
The reception is a volumetric box-shaped room that has two glass walls on both the front and back ends and the other two walls are adorned with interior plants, wood and aluminium screens. Photo: Noor-A-Alam
Habitat

The United House: Living and working inside nature

The Business Standard
Top
  • Home
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • About Us
  • Bangladesh
  • International
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Economy
  • Sitemap
  • RSS

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net

Copyright © 2022 THE BUSINESS STANDARD All rights reserved. Technical Partner: RSI Lab