Why Afghanistan is the war that’s so hard to end
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Splash
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Long Read
  • Games
  • Epaper
  • More
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Subscribe
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard
FRIDAY, MAY 27, 2022
FRIDAY, MAY 27, 2022
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Splash
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Long Read
  • Games
  • Epaper
  • More
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Subscribe
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
Why Afghanistan is the war that’s so hard to end

World+Biz

Nick Wadhams
29 February, 2020, 08:10 pm
Last modified: 29 February, 2020, 08:48 pm

Related News

  • Afghanistan's Taliban step up coal exports to boost local budget
  • Taliban to sign agreement with UAE to cooperate on airport operations
  • Bangladesh to donate Tk1 crore for humanitarian efforts in Afghanistan
  • Over 59 million internally displaced in 2021
  • Taliban dissolve Afghanistan's Human Rights Commission, other key bodies

Why Afghanistan is the war that’s so hard to end

Nick Wadhams
29 February, 2020, 08:10 pm
Last modified: 29 February, 2020, 08:48 pm
Why Afghanistan is the war that’s so hard to end

The longest war in American history has gone on for more than 18 years. The US and its NATO-led allies announced the official conclusion of their combat mission in Afghanistan in 2014.

But with the country remaining in violent turmoil, plans for the exit of the coalition have been repeatedly put off. US President Donald Trump has expressed an eagerness to withdraw his country's forces, which make up about 13,000 of the almost 23,000 foreign troops there.

His government is pursuing a peace deal with the Taliban, the Islamic fundamentalists who once ruled the country and have reclaimed significant patches of it.

The Situation

The US said in late February that, conditional on a week-long reduction in violence, it would sign a peace agreement with the Taliban paving the way for a US troop withdrawal and new talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government.

The plan was a gamble that Afghanistan's President Ashraf Ghani, who was declared the winner of a disputed 2019 election, will retain enough authority to pull together representatives for such an intra-Afghan dialogue. Ghani's rival, chief executive Abdullah Abdullah, has accused Ghani of rigging the vote and declared himself the victor.

The Taliban has also rejected the outcome of the vote, saying it had no legitimacy because it was conducted under the "umbrella of occupation." Despite the US having spent an estimated $900 billion on the Afghan conflict, the Taliban are at their strongest since being ousted from power.

The group controls or contests about half the country and regularly stages attacks in Kabul. The Afghan military, which receives training and advice from the US and its allies, has been hampered by insufficient air power and heavy combat losses and desertions.

The Background

In 1989, the Soviet military pulled out of Afghanistan, after a decade-long occupation that had made the country a front line in the Cold War.

The US, which actively supported the Soviets' opponents, including radical Islamist factions, also disengaged. Bloody chaos followed until the Taliban seized the capital Kabul from the feuding warlords who had all but levelled it.

The Taliban imposed stern theocratic rule and gave the terrorist group al-Qaeda a base. In 2001, after the Taliban refused to extradite al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden following his group's Sept. 11 attacks on the US, the US invaded Afghanistan.

When bin Laden and the Taliban leadership fled, the US mission morphed into a nation-building undertaking — but with limited military resources, as the US focused on a separate war in Iraq. Eventually, more than 50 nations joined the coalition led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

File Photo: A member of the Afghan security forces stands guard next to damaged army vehicles after a Taliban attack in Ghazni city, Afghanistan August 15, 2018. Reuters/Mustafa Andaleb
File Photo: A member of the Afghan security forces stands guard next to damaged army vehicles after a Taliban attack in Ghazni city, Afghanistan August 15, 2018. Reuters/Mustafa Andaleb

In 2009, US President Barack Obama ordered a "surge" in forces that reached a peak of 140,000 in 2011. Military commanders reported progress on the ground, but war fatigue at home, especially after the killing of bin Laden in Pakistan, led Obama to start winding down the American troop presence.

Doubts that the Afghan military could stand on its own prompted him to leave the last of them in place when he turned the presidency over to Trump in January 2017.

Within a year, Trump had deployed an additional 3,500 US troops to the country at the Pentagon's urging. An estimated 212,000 people have been killed in the conflict in Afghanistan and neighbouring Pakistan.

The Argument

There's widespread agreement in the US that the war against the Taliban can't be won militarily. The US commander in charge of American and coalition forces, General Scott Miller, said just that in an interview with NBC in late 2018.

There are divisions, however, over how fast and under what conditions the US should exit the fight. On one end are those who say it's important to first negotiate a political agreement that would constrain the Taliban in the event they regain power.

In this scenario, the Taliban would pledge to never again allow a global terrorist threat to emanate from Afghanistan and to respect the country's current laws and constitution, that is, refrain from reinstituting strict Islamic law. On the other end are those who say such assurances from the Taliban would be meaningless.

Some who hold this position say the priority should be to stop pouring lives and money into remaking Afghanistan when it isn't working and wasn't the original motivation for the war. Others argue it's too dangerous to leave Afghanistan with the Taliban as strong as they are and the Afghan forces as weak.

Disclaimer: This article first appeared on Bloomberg.com, and is published by special syndication arrangement.

Top News

Afghanistan / war

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • All banks have to sell dollars at same rate
    All banks have to sell dollars at same rate
  • Ctg port Asia’s least efficient for container handling: World Bank
    Ctg port Asia’s least efficient for container handling: World Bank
  • Photo: Bloomberg
    Bigger food crisis can be averted if Asia remembers not to panic

MOST VIEWED

  • FILE PHOTO: An image of Elon Musk is seen on a smartphone placed on printed Twitter logos in this picture illustration taken April 28, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration
    Musk sued by Twitter investors for delayed disclosure of stake
  • A labourer unloads coal from a truck at a coal dump site on the outskirts of Kabul, Afghanistan March 7, 2017. REUTERS/Mohammad Ismail
    Afghanistan's Taliban step up coal exports to boost local budget
  • WHO condemns Russia's aggression in Ukraine in rare vote
    WHO condemns Russia's aggression in Ukraine in rare vote
  • India's Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) personnel stand guard on the banks of Dal Lake, a famous tourist attraction, in Srinagar May 26, 2022. REUTERS/Danish Ismail
    India's Kashmir sees upsurge in violence, tense after separatist convicted
  • People gather at Robb Elementary School, the scene of a mass shooting in Uvalde, Texas, U.S., May 25, 2022. REUTERS/Nuri Vallbona
    Texas school shooting leaves American parents angry, anxious, resigned
  • Photo: Bloomberg
    Bigger food crisis can be averted if Asia remembers not to panic

Related News

  • Afghanistan's Taliban step up coal exports to boost local budget
  • Taliban to sign agreement with UAE to cooperate on airport operations
  • Bangladesh to donate Tk1 crore for humanitarian efforts in Afghanistan
  • Over 59 million internally displaced in 2021
  • Taliban dissolve Afghanistan's Human Rights Commission, other key bodies

Features

Photo caption: Business models are already being hit by climate risk. It is the function of regulators to force banks to pay attention to the future risks to businesses. Photo: Bloomberg

HSBC and its discordant climate songbook

12h | Panorama
Illustration: TBS

Should Belayets be allowed to return to school at 55?

16h | Pursuit
Impact Hub Dhaka is designed to cater to connectivity, offering lots of communal areas where you can chat over coffee, watch a webinar as a group or even host events. Photo: Courtesy

Inside Impact Hub: The surprising benefits of working in a co-working space

17h | Pursuit
Pacific Jeans uses sustainable technology in washing and finishing, and now has the facility to wash with zero water. Photo: Courtesy

How big dreams and smart investment made Pacific Jeans a denim exporting giant 

18h | Panorama

More Videos from TBS

Inflation changes lives of limited-income people

Inflation changes lives of limited-income people

5h | Videos
 Vat on locally-made mobile phones, fridges may increase prices

Vat on locally-made mobile phones, fridges may increase prices

6h | Videos
Local brands dominate country’s refrigerator market

Local brands dominate country’s refrigerator market

6h | Videos
5 latest exciting movies

5 latest exciting movies

10h | Videos

Most Read

1
Tk100 for bike, Tk2,400 for bus to cross Padma Bridge
Bangladesh

Tk100 for bike, Tk2,400 for bus to cross Padma Bridge

2
Bangladesh at risk of losing ownership of Banglar Samriddhi
Bangladesh

Bangladesh at risk of losing ownership of Banglar Samriddhi

3
Corporates go cashless…tax cut on cards
NBR

Corporates go cashless…tax cut on cards

4
Photo: Courtesy
Panorama

Misfit Technologies: A Singaporean startup rooted firmly in Bangladesh

5
BSEC launches probe against Abul Khayer Hero and allies
Stocks

BSEC launches probe against Abul Khayer Hero and allies

6
Illustration: TBS
Banking

Let taka slide

The Business Standard
Top
  • Home
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • About Us
  • Bangladesh
  • International
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Economy
  • Sitemap
  • RSS

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net

Copyright © 2022 THE BUSINESS STANDARD All rights reserved. Technical Partner: RSI Lab