Win or lose, US war against China or Russia won’t be short
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Splash
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Long Read
  • Games
  • Epaper
  • More
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Subscribe
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard
FRIDAY, MAY 20, 2022
FRIDAY, MAY 20, 2022
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Splash
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Long Read
  • Games
  • Epaper
  • More
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Subscribe
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
Win or lose, US war against China or Russia won’t be short

Panorama

Hal Brands, Bloomberg
16 June, 2021, 12:45 pm
Last modified: 16 June, 2021, 02:01 pm

Related News

  • Ukraine says it gets $530 mln in US, UK grants from World Bank fund
  • US fully backs Sweden and Finland Nato bids: Biden
  • US aims to arm Ukraine with advanced anti-ship missiles to fight Russian blockade
  • Top US, Russian generals speak for first time since Ukraine invasion
  • Biden to meet leaders of Finland, Sweden on NATO expansion

Win or lose, US war against China or Russia won’t be short

The US may be able to repulse an assault on Taiwan or the Baltics. But what comes next?

Hal Brands, Bloomberg
16 June, 2021, 12:45 pm
Last modified: 16 June, 2021, 02:01 pm
Military men: Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin. Photo: Greg Baker via Bloomberg
Military men: Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin. Photo: Greg Baker via Bloomberg

"For every thousand pages published on the causes of wars," wrote the scholar Geoffrey Blainey half a century ago, "there is less than one page on the causes of peace." A modified version of Blainey's lament might usefully guide US military planning today.

The Pentagon is getting serious about prevailing in the opening stages of a war with China or Russia. But wars between great powers rarely end after the opening salvo. The US needs to be preparing for big, grinding conflicts that could drag on for months or years — and thinking as much about how those wars will end as how they might begin.

The scenarios for a war against China or Russia are easily imaginable. Beijing tries to invade Taiwan or make it surrender through bombardment and blockade. Chinese forces strike US allies, such as Japan or the Philippines, in Asia's inner seas. Russia launches a Baltic blitz against the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's most exposed members.

American military planners have, appropriately, turned their attention to deterring these moves and fighting back if they occur. They are focusing especially on avoiding the fait accompli — where Russia or China uses military superiority around the target to quickly grab territory that is just too costly for the US to liberate. So the Pentagon must amass the capabilities, and devise the concepts, necessary to break a Russian armored assault or sink a Chinese invasion fleet.

But then what? Even if the US succeeded in blocking the first attack, the war might not end quickly. Ever since the Industrial Revolution and the advent of the mass army allowed countries to mobilize resources on a gargantuan scale, great-power wars have more often been long than short.

The Napoleonic Wars, the US Civil War, World Wars I and II — all were decided by slow, relentless attrition rather than rapid, decisive annihilation. And even if Russia or China failed in the early stages of a conflict, they would have strong reasons to keep trying.

Russian strongman Vladimir Putin or Chinese leader Xi Jinping would surely fear that admitting defeat at the hands of the US would leave their country geopolitically crippled. They would worry that starting, and then losing, a major war would imperil their political survival. In political science terms, they might "gamble for resurrection" rather than meekly concede.

China might mount second and third efforts to break Taiwan's defenses, or try to strangle it economically. Russia could test NATO's defenses in the Black Sea or on some other front. Either country could employ cyberattacks, long-range conventional strikes, or other capabilities to target the US homeland and put pressure on its alliances.

The nightmare scenario involves Russia or China using, or threatening to use, nuclear weapons in hopes of making Washington back down in a struggle over small countries thousands of miles from America's shores.

Stopping an opening assault on Taiwan or the Baltic states might prove to be the 21st century equivalent of France's desperate stand on the Marne River in the opening weeks of World War I — a heroic, necessary defense that simply set the stage for a long, bloody conflict.

There are three main implications for the US First, American war planning should focus not only on speed — how quickly the Pentagon can push powerful combat forces forward when the shooting starts — but also on endurance.

The outcome of a great-power war may be determined by what happens after the first campaign — who can ramp up production of missiles and other munitions, who can quickly replace lost ships and aircraft, who has the stronger, more adaptive industrial base and can better withstand the economic damage a conflict will inflict.

Properly arming for war is essential; rearming during a war will be vital, too.

Second, the US will face the delicate task of both exploiting and limiting escalation. When wars go long, the combatants typically search for new sources of leverage: Witness Germany's turn to unrestricted submarine warfare in World War I.

The US could conceivably seek to end a protracted war with China through severe economic and technological sanctions, or through a maritime blockade that shuts off oil shipments and other key imports. But it may also need, through a mixture of firmness and restraint, to discourage an adversary from launching crippling cyberattacks or resorting to nuclear escalation. In America's post-Cold War conflicts with weak enemies, the threat of escalation was mostly a one-way street. That won't be the case in the future.

Third, the US needs to treat the dilemmas of war termination as seriously as it does the challenges of warfighting. A violent showdown with a well-armed, nuclear-equipped foe is unlikely to end in a total US victory or a complete enemy capitulation. The better America fares in a conflict with an authoritarian adversary, the more dangerous and unpredictable that adversary's behavior may become.

The US will need realistic thinking about what level of sustained coercion and destruction would be required to make a committed aggressor call it quits — and about what sorts of face-saving diplomacy might help bring an intense but limited fight to a close.

It doesn't take much skill or foresight to start a big war. It may take a lot of endurance and creativity to end a great-power conflict somewhere short of disaster.


Hal Brands is the Henry A Kissinger Distinguished Professor at the Henry A. Kissinger Center for Global Affairs at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies and a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.


Disclaimer: This article first appeared on Bloomberg, and is published by special syndication arrangement

Analysis / Top News / World+Biz

US-China / US-Russia / US-Russia Relations / US-China Relations / US foreign policy / US / USA

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Students suffer over costlier food at public university canteens
    Students suffer over costlier food at public university canteens
  • Infographic: TBS
    Businesses reel under soaring costs
  • Photo: Mumit M/TBS
    What delays infrastructure projects in Bangladesh?

MOST VIEWED

  • Photo caption: In the case of Sweden and Finland, the tipping point was clearly an altered view of Russian intentions and their willingness “to use violence.” Photo: Reuters
    What are Sweden and Finland thinking?
  • Professor Mustafizur Rahman. Illustration: TBS
    Project delays and escalating costs are driven by frequent revisions and lack of good governance
  • Photo: Mumit M/TBS
    What delays infrastructure projects in Bangladesh?
  • A green economic transition must not affect the wellbeing of the over 4 million RMG workers. Picture: MumitM/TBS
    Just Transition in an unjust world
  • Illustration: TBS
    Dhaka’s kerb market money exchangers losing out on customers
  • Sketch: TBS
    'Food inflation is an unavoidable consequence of currency devaluation'

Related News

  • Ukraine says it gets $530 mln in US, UK grants from World Bank fund
  • US fully backs Sweden and Finland Nato bids: Biden
  • US aims to arm Ukraine with advanced anti-ship missiles to fight Russian blockade
  • Top US, Russian generals speak for first time since Ukraine invasion
  • Biden to meet leaders of Finland, Sweden on NATO expansion

Features

Professor Mustafizur Rahman. Illustration: TBS

Project delays and escalating costs are driven by frequent revisions and lack of good governance

2h | Panorama
Photo: Mumit M/TBS

What delays infrastructure projects in Bangladesh?

2h | Panorama
Foods that you should never put in the refrigerator

Foods that you should never put in the refrigerator

3h | Food
Photo caption: In the case of Sweden and Finland, the tipping point was clearly an altered view of Russian intentions and their willingness “to use violence.” Photo: Reuters

What are Sweden and Finland thinking?

22m | Panorama

More Videos from TBS

Ways to retain body fragrance

Ways to retain body fragrance

17m | Videos
Gazipur restaurant that serves 150 food items

Gazipur restaurant that serves 150 food items

3h | Videos
How to prepare for a job

How to prepare for a job

4h | Videos
Putin's strategies to face Nato

Putin's strategies to face Nato

16h | Videos

Most Read

1
Tk100 for bike, Tk2,400 for bus to cross Padma Bridge
Bangladesh

Tk100 for bike, Tk2,400 for bus to cross Padma Bridge

2
Representative Photo: Pixabay.
Bangladesh

Microplastics found in 5 local sugar brands

3
Mushfiq Mobarak. Photo: Noor-A-Alam
Panorama

Meet the Yale professor who anchors his research in Bangladesh and scales up interventions globally

4
A packet of US five-dollar bills is inspected at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing in Washington March 26, 2015. REUTERS/Gary Cameron
Banking

Dollar hits Tk100 mark in open market

5
The story of Bangladesh becoming a major bicycle exporter
Industry

The story of Bangladesh becoming a major bicycle exporter

6
PK Halder: How a scamster rose from humble beginnings to a Tk11,000cr empire
Crime

PK Halder: How a scamster rose from humble beginnings to a Tk11,000cr empire

The Business Standard
Top
  • Home
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • About Us
  • Bangladesh
  • International
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Economy
  • Sitemap
  • RSS

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net

Copyright © 2022 THE BUSINESS STANDARD All rights reserved. Technical Partner: RSI Lab