Verdict on OC Moazzem November 28
Judge Ash-Shams Jaglul Hussein set the date today after completion of the hearing
The Dhaka Cyber Tribunal has fixed November 28 to pronounce verdict on former Sonagazi officer-in-charge Moazzem Hossain in a case filed under the Digital Security Act for spreading a video of Feni madrasa student Nusrat Jahan Rafi.
Judge Ash-Shams Jaglul Hussein set the date today after completion of the hearing. A total of 12 prosecution witnesses testified before the court.
On June 16, Moazzem Hossain was arrested from Shahbagh area in Dhaka 20 days after Dhaka Cyber Tribunal issued an arrest warrant against him.
On May 10, Moazzem, OC of Sonagazi Model Police Station, was suspended on charge of negligence of duty in connection with the death of Nusrat after an arson attack.
On April 10, he was withdrawn and attached to the Armed Police Battalion (APBN).
On April 15, Supreme Court lawyer Barrister Sayedul Haque Sumon filed a case under the Digital Security Act against him for spreading a video on social media on Nusrat's statement at the police station.
According to the case statement, the OC called Nusrat to the police station on March 27 after she filed a case against Maulana Siraj-ud-Doula, principal of Sonagazi Islamia Senior Fazil Madrasa, for sexually harassing her.
During interrogation at the police station, he asked her offensive and unpleasant questions over the incident. Later, the OC spread the video on the social media.
On April 6, Nusrat was set on fire at an examination centre allegedly by people loyal to the principal of her madrasa after he was arrested and subsequently suspended as she had accused him of sexually harassing her.
She lost her battle for life on April 10 at Dhaka Medical College Hospital in the capital.
A case was filed accusing eight identified people, including madrasa principal Siraj-ud-Doula, lecturer of English Absar Uddin, Feni municipality councilor Maksudul Alam Maksud, and four unidentified ones. The court death penalty to 16 accused.
The public prosecutor Mohammad Shamim mentioned that the prosecution witness testified and the accused punished according to the Law.
