Time to revisit the concept of insider lending?
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Tuesday
August 16, 2022

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
TUESDAY, AUGUST 16, 2022
Time to revisit the concept of insider lending?

Analysis

Zahid Hussain
23 January, 2020, 05:10 pm
Last modified: 23 January, 2020, 05:13 pm

Related News

  • Default loans jump Tk22,000cr in six months
  • Banks welcome move allowing them to reschedule defaulted loans
  • The big default? The dozen countries in the danger zone
  • Default loans of NBFIs up Tk1,216cr in Q1
  • Moratorium withdrawal leads to Tk10,167cr default loan increase

Time to revisit the concept of insider lending?

The best hedge against the malignant effects of insider lending is to enhance the quality of board members by ensuring that only fit and proper persons are appointed while entrenching greater transparency and accountability. What is needed is better regulation and enforcement, not more regulation.

Zahid Hussain
23 January, 2020, 05:10 pm
Last modified: 23 January, 2020, 05:13 pm
Time to revisit the concept of insider lending?

According to the statistics provided by the Finance Minister on January 22 in the parliament, directors of various banks borrowed about Tk 173, 231 crores from their own as well as other banks. Directors of 25 banks have borrowed Tk 1,615 crore from their banks, constituting 0.166 percent of the outstanding loans of the banks.  Bank directors borrowed Tk 171,616 crores from 55 other banks, constituting 11.21 percent of their total loans.

How much of this is insider lending?

Insider lending is defined under the Banking Companies Act as any loan facility or guarantee or security provided to a Director of a bank or to his relatives. It must be sanctioned by the Board of Directors of the bank and has to be specifically mentioned in the bank's balance sheet. The total amount of the loan facilities extendable to a Director or to his relatives should not exceed 50 percent of the paid-up value of the shares of that bank held in Director's own name without the consent of the Bangladesh Bank (BB). The credit terms have to be the same as commonly applicable to the outside borrowers. There is no specific regulation on directors of different banks borrowing from each other.

Strictly speaking, therefore, only the 0.166 percent part of loans to the directors counts as insider lending.  Since a Director borrowing from some other bank is an outsider to the other bank, such lending cannot be considered as lending to insider even though the borrowing Director, typically also an owner, is an insider to the banking system. The Director borrowing from his or her own bank is an inside insider whereas the Director borrowing from a bank other than his or her own is an insider in the system but outsider to all others except one's own bank.

Insider lending of any kind need not necessarily be bad in principle but has precipitated several systemic breakdowns in practice. It can work, but when it doesn't, disasters follow.

Insider lending can facilitate financial transactions by overcoming extreme informational asymmetries that often plague less developed economies. China is cited as a case in point. Many studies attribute much of the financing of China's spectacular economic rise to the creation of specialized financial companies by Chinese business groups in the mid-1980s. These finance companies collected and redistributed funds within the group and even obtained funds from state banks on behalf of member firms. The finance company substituted for more well-developed formal financial system.

Experience elsewhere show that conflicts of interest under insider lending encourage insiders to loot depositors. Related parties borrow at lower rates, are less likely to post collateral and more likely to default than unrelated ones. The Mexican banking system in the 1990s is a case in point. Banks were acquired by local families that already controlled industrial groups. Insider lending significantly undermined financial stability. Russia's experience is as horrifying. The structure of banking in Post-Soviet Russia has had the effect of making looting a dominant strategy for private banks. Insider fraud and other problems were evident in 61 percent of 286 bank failures in the US in 1990 and 1991.

These experiences suggest that the risk that related lending may lead to looting is great when banks are controlled by industrial firms and corporate as well as regulatory governance is weak.

The reason for restrictions on insider lending is to protect "other peoples' money" from insiders.
Any lending to insiders that is not restricted places a risk on customer deposits. The oversight role in the management of a commercial bank is placed on the Board of Directors. The board would ensure the safety of depositor funds. In essence, because the Board of Directors has insight within the bank, unlike other outsiders, the expectation is that they will raise red-flags if they appear and notify the regulator or ensure there are risk management mechanisms to deal with any potential fall-out.  However, when the Board is dominated by members of a single family whose tenure is 9 years long, what mechanism is there to prevent them from lending to Board members of another bank on the understanding that the latter will return the favor?

Why is the logic justifying restrictions on lending to insiders within a bank not applicable to lending to insiders within the banking system?

The majority of bank insiders may be honest and prudent individuals who fulfill their duties in good faith. Yet, participation in insider lending practices within the system is a significant reality in Bangladesh's banking industry as the latest data shows. Mind you, the financial statements submitted to the BB are prepared by the Directors of the banks where only lending to the "inside insiders" is disclosed. Even in such disclosures, directors can report insider loans in the customer loans. Additionally, they can place them in the Non-Performing Loan category and may later write them off.

Because excessive and unregulated insider loans can severely upset the financial security of a bank and possibly lead to its failure, strict limitations and regulation of insider credit extensions are put in place to ensure a safe bank. The regulations governing insider credit appear at first glance to restrict many facets of insider credit transactions. The assumption is as long as insiders are restricted from plundering their own depositors, the bank is safe. 

Does that guarantee the safety of the system as a whole? It is quite evident that insiders still possess the ability to obtain credit in an unregulated manner as long as it is from other banks. There is nothing preventing the Director of a bank from colluding with the Director of another to extend credit to each other. Also, Directors of private banks allegedly borrow from state-owned banks to meet the capital shortfall in their banks.

Regulations seem to overlook the relationships among key players in the financial system. The focus on individual banks ignores the complex relationships among the players that could lead to system-wide risks.  There is a need to hedge systemic defects in the system by focusing on the banking system as a whole and the multifaceted relationships among key players. The best hedge against the malignant effects of insider lending is to enhance the quality of board members by ensuring that only fit and proper persons are appointed while entrenching greater transparency and accountability. What is needed is better regulation and enforcement, not more regulation.

The author is an economist.

Economy / Top News

lending / Single digit / Default loans

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • This is how people are choked with rising cost of living
    This is how people are choked with rising cost of living
  • File photo. Forty-four countries imported LNG last year, almost twice as many as a decade ago. Photo: Asim Hafeez/Bloomberg
    Unaffordability of LNG may leave new import terminals redundant: IEEFA
  • Civil society needs 'space, enabling conditions': Bachelet
    Civil society needs 'space, enabling conditions': Bachelet

MOST VIEWED

  • Asia analysts predict biggest profit drop since pandemic started
    Asia analysts predict biggest profit drop since pandemic started
  • Infigraphic: TBS
    The dollar crunch chronicles
  • The logo of Italian payments group Nexi is pictured outside their headquarters in Milan, Italy, March 28, 2019. REUTERS/Alessandro Garofalo/File Photo
    Bruised by a valuation freefall, payments companies brace for M&A
  • TBS file image
    There are ways to lessen the burden of fuel price hike. Countries show how
  • The fuel price hike is triggering a chain effect on the whole economy on top of making lives costlier - and for many unaffordable - for the masses. Photo: Rajib Dhar/TBS
    BPC says it can’t afford any more losses. Not everyone is convinced
  • A little great-power competition is healthy for Africa
    A little great-power competition is healthy for Africa

Related News

  • Default loans jump Tk22,000cr in six months
  • Banks welcome move allowing them to reschedule defaulted loans
  • The big default? The dozen countries in the danger zone
  • Default loans of NBFIs up Tk1,216cr in Q1
  • Moratorium withdrawal leads to Tk10,167cr default loan increase

Features

TBS Sketch

Bangabandhu and the spirit of Liberation War were killed in 1975

16h | Supplement
The macabre multicide: How we failed our supreme leader

The macabre multicide: How we failed our supreme leader

19h | Supplement
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman with his eldest daughter Sheikh Hasina and his grandson Sajeeb Wazed at his Dhanmondi residence. Photo: Achieve

The darkest night of 15 August

21h | Supplement
As long as the Padma and the Meghna will flow…

As long as the Padma and the Meghna will flow…

22h | Supplement

More Videos from TBS

Public pay homage to Bangabandhu

Public pay homage to Bangabandhu

11h | Videos
What will happen if Ukraine's Zaporizhia nuclear plant explodes?

What will happen if Ukraine's Zaporizhia nuclear plant explodes?

12h | Videos
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the undisputed leader

Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the undisputed leader

12h | Videos
How is Bangladesh benefited from receiving India's daily import quota?

How is Bangladesh benefited from receiving India's daily import quota?

13h | Videos

Most Read

1
Dollar crisis: BB orders removal of 6 banks’ treasury chiefs 
Banking

Dollar crisis: BB orders removal of 6 banks’ treasury chiefs 

2
From left Afzal Karim, Murshedul Kabir and Mohammad Jahangir
Banking

Sonali, Agrani and Rupali banks get new MDs

3
Photo: TBS
Bangladesh

5 crushed to death as BRT girder falls on car in Uttara

4
Dollar price drops by Tk8 in kerb market
Economy

Dollar price drops by Tk8 in kerb market

5
Representational Image. Photo: Collected
Bangladesh

Air passengers should plan extra commute time to airport: DMP

6
Photo: Collected
Transport

Will Tokyo’s traffic model solve Dhaka’s gridlocks?

EMAIL US
[email protected]
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2022
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - [email protected]

For advertisement- [email protected]